TractorByNet.com - View Single Post

Brad_Blazer · 11-02-2006, 10:02 AM

The difference between my drawing and the Cammon is that the Cammon rippers are pinned directly to the tube with no shackels and the ripper channels are open in the back to allow the rippers to swing back as the tube travels in an arc. My design is geared more toward modifying a standard box blade where the rippers must move straight up and down within the clearance of their channels.
Check out the lower ripper supports Rob (3RRL) added to his ripper channels. Those should be compatiable with the geometry I've sketched but they would not function properly with the Cammon design.

Brad

11-02-2006, 10:02 AM	#10 (permalink)
Brad_Blazer Gold Member Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Caldwell Co. NC Posts: 291	Re: Hydraulic box blade teeth? The difference between my drawing and the Cammon is that the Cammon rippers are pinned directly to the tube with no shackels and the ripper channels are open in the back to allow the rippers to swing back as the tube travels in an arc. My design is geared more toward modifying a standard box blade where the rippers must move straight up and down within the clearance of their channels. Check out the lower ripper supports Rob (3RRL) added to his ripper channels. Those should be compatiable with the geometry I've sketched but they would not function properly with the Cammon design. Brad __________________ 2006 Kama 554, 92 Belarus 250AS, Bombardier Outlander Max 400.