Thread: Safety of a HST
View Single Post
Old 05-23-2008, 11:24 AM   #23 (permalink)
Volfandt
Veteran Member
 
Volfandt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 1,615
Default Re: Safety of a HST

Uhhh Ohhh, whatcha gonna do,,,, the safety police is gonna come for you

I must confess, I learned my tractoring on an old 48 Ferguson TE20 and 66 856 Wheel Horse and neither had any kind of shutdown switches other than the ignition switch. No ROPS either. Safety was the responsibility of the operator (me) to practice properly.
I have many gates to open and close as well as having to constantly dismount to remove debris in my path that gets scattered about so in MY case I've found it more benefitial to by-pass the seat switches to keep the wear and tear of disengageing/reengageing pto powered implements down to a minimum. Thus I can safely remove my seat from the seat when needed. This is a responsibility I knowingly accept, as well as the consequences.
My ROPS does get pinned up when operating tho, it makes a great radio and aux lights mounting frame

re. original question, IMHO the foot controlled HST is much more safer than either the lever controlled HST AND/OR gear model tractors (I have all three types). I can easily control my speed, in either forward or reverse PRECISELY while simultaniously haveing both hands free to control both the tractor and implement.
I've never suffered fatigue on my foot controlled HST but if it did become an issue I'd add the crusie control feature to it in a NY minute
__________________
BX23 w/60" MMM & thumb.
1966 Wheelhorse 856, Gear drive.
1966 Wheelhorse 876, HST drive.
w/50"sickle mower, 36" RDM, snow/grader plow, Alternator welder.
Volfandt is offline   Reply With Quote