View Single Post
Old 10-19-2006, 10:04 AM   #26 (permalink)
ovrszd
Veteran Member
 
ovrszd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,066
Default Re: Difference between 4WD and MFWD

Quote:
Originally Posted by N80
If the bevel gear 4wd system that Kubota uses in all its tractors creates this weak link, then why do they go to the trouble of using a system that is clearly more complex, and probably more costly to manufacture than a standard live-axle system? In other words, if the design creates a "weak spot" as you say, where is the advantage in this sytem that makes it worth introducing such a weakness?
Every complex mechanical system in use has a weak spot. In this system it just happens to be the spyder gears. It's not an intentionally weak design. I'm sure they weighed all of the consequences of different systems and chose the one that produced the quality they desired at the cheapest cost of production. They don't use a standard live axle system like the rear axle of a car or truck because it would give them a horribly low hanging differential and axle tube that no one would like.
__________________
Richard
Kubota L4400, JD2210
ovrszd is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.02262 seconds with 8 queries