3pt. hitch woodsplitter

   / 3pt. hitch woodsplitter #1  

WV John Deere

Bronze Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
56
Location
West Virginia
Tractor
John Deere 3520 w/cab
Been thinking of buying a 3pt. hitch hydraulic woodsplitter. I split 1 quad axle log truck load of wood a year.

I looked at Wallenstein and am considering them. Only real must is that it will work vertical. I'm not lifting all that wood up onto a horizontal splitter!

I want a good one to last me for years to come.

Anyone have a 3pt. hitch hydraulic splittler or experience with one?
 
   / 3pt. hitch woodsplitter #2  
Been thinking of buying a 3pt. hitch hydraulic woodsplitter. I split 1 quad axle log truck load of wood a year.

I looked at Wallenstein and am considering them. Only real must is that it will work vertical. I'm not lifting all that wood up onto a horizontal splitter!

I want a good one to last me for years to come.

Anyone have a 3pt. hitch hydraulic splittler or experience with one?

I'm thinking about one of the Wally splitters myself. I just got their BXM32 chipper/shredder. It is one fine machine, very well built and works like a champ. So I now have confidence in them. If you do get a Wallenstein splitter please let us know which model and how you like it.

Al

P.S. Woodward Crossings had a great price on the BXM32, so you may want to check their prices on the splitters.
 
   / 3pt. hitch woodsplitter #3  
I know some like them and some dont and there are pros and cons to both but I am not a fam of 3PH splitters.

So I have to ask why are you considering one instead of a stand-alone.

There are several reasons I wouldn't want one.

First of all, your tractor has a 8.6GPM single stage pump and 2500psi. A decient splitter like a Speeco/TSC huskee will typically have a 16GPM pump @ 3000psi. Which is typically faster and have more force. (assuming the 3PH splitter isn't driven off the PTO.

Second reason is I see it as a big waste. To use a 37HP tractor to split wood isn't going to be as efficcient as a small 8HP gas motor. And I wouldn't want to run up the hours/wear/tear on a $25000 tractor when a $1200 splitter will do just fine, and probabally faster.

There are several good reviews of speeco splitters (same as TSC Huskee's) over on arboristsite as well as the rest of the web. We have had their 27 ton model for about 10 years @ 25-30 cord per year. We have had to do absolutly nothing to it other than regular maintenance/filters/fluids.

We also like to make a day in the woods of felling/cutting/splitting/and loading. With 2-3 people doing different things. A 3PH splitter ties up the tractor that we could be using for other things while someone else splits.

Just some food for thought. I am curious why YOU want one instead of a stand alone?? There must be a market for them or they'd quit making them. I have just never saw any benifits of them other than a few hundred bucks savings. But the added maintenance cost/wear/fuel/hours on the tractor would offset that in no time. Just my opionion though.
 
   / 3pt. hitch woodsplitter #4  
I have a Wessex / Bell and it would not be on my list to buy again.

However, a more general point I have learned trying to sort issues with my splitter is to look at the sixze of the RAM vs the splitting power quoted. A 4" RAM will give approx 12T at 2000psi (approx). A cheaper product may try to get the same force with a 3.25" RAM and a 3200psi pump.

J
 
   / 3pt. hitch woodsplitter #5  
a little over a year ago i built a 3ph splitter (i only had to buy the valve, cylinder, lines, fittings, and pins - the structural parts were pretty much all surplus collected over the last 10 years. i have two new regency wood burners - one medium and one large. by my opinions, neither of them are very big, but they do produce a lot of heat and don't use much wood. i have to cut all my wood 16" long to be able to fit both stoves. i also cut it to 4" or less diameter due to the door size.

i was planning on the same vertical approach because large pieces are too awkward to lift and balance, but an uncle basically told me to rethink because since it's a 3ph, i can drop it flat on the ground. i used a 4" beam when i built it, so it sits low enough that very large logs could be rolled on it. this eliminates the need for the vertical option. after using it, i find that i like the beam very high. it puts the work at a level where i'm not hunched over to operate it. if you have/add a small table then the wood will stay at level so you can break the large pieces down into smaller ones without bending.

i built my splitter very small (3-1/2x18 cylinder, 19" log opening), since the power source is also small (jd770-5.6gpm). i reasoned that i don't often split extremely large hardwoods, and i can't use over 18", so why wait for a 24" cylinder to take up the slack after it cycles back. if you buy it you generally get tops, and are 16" and under for good burning hardwoods. to date, i have only split logs that i have dropped around the property, and nothing over 12", but it went through those with ease. i'm sure i'll eventually have something it won't handle, so i may have to occasionally saw a log in half, but it hasn't happened yet. besides, in my mind it's criminal to turn large hardwoods into firewood. with the price of good cabinetmaking lumber, i'd turn large logs into lumber before i burned them.
 
   / 3pt. hitch woodsplitter #6  
I bought a used Timberwolf TW-3, 3PT splitter and love it. It has a PTO pump that puts out 20GPM and the result is a 6 sec cycle time and virtually no waiting. If you want a unit built for the long haul, look at a Timberwolf.
 
   / 3pt. hitch woodsplitter #7  
When my horizontal splitter was at the wrong place, I rented a vertical one. Never again will I use a vertical splitter. It's **** on your back since you are always bent over moving the rounds and the split pieces.
YMMV
 
   / 3pt. hitch woodsplitter #8  
I tend to agree I like to do the initial lift and then split. All i have is horizontal one. But I can see where it would be an advantage to go vertical for the huge ones.
 
   / 3pt. hitch woodsplitter #9  
A nice thing about my 3 PT splitter is the abality to move it up and down. All the way from the ground, up to a comfortable working height. I also can adjust he height so it clears the back of my utility trailer and I slplit right into the trailer.
 
   / 3pt. hitch woodsplitter #10  
I have a Wessex / Bell and it would not be on my list to buy again.

However, a more general point I have learned trying to sort issues with my splitter is to look at the sixze of the RAM vs the splitting power quoted. A 4" RAM will give approx 12T at 2000psi (approx). A cheaper product may try to get the same force with a 3.25" RAM and a 3200psi pump.

J

A 3.25 ram @ 3200psi actually has 1500lbs more force than a 4" @ 2000psi.

Just because a smaller ram and higher psi pump is used does not mean that it is a cheaper product. But what it does mean is that if GPM of both pumps is the same, the 3.25 ram will cycle faster due to much less volume to fill the cylinder.

But I do agree with the fact that most splitters are overrated on tonnage. I've seen 4" cylinders rated anywhere from 18-22 ton and 4.5" I have seen rated up to 30 ton.

Even though I doubt (I may be wrong) that most splitters hoses/valve/cylinder are rated to 3500psi That is what out speeco/husky 27 ton will peak at with ram all the way extended. which makes it a true 27 ton.
 
 
 
Top