I know with my out of date melletti 48" tiller, four tines per flange, forward spin has always left a good to excellent finish. Speed and gate position has more to due with quality of the finish I believe, than a market ploy of overcharging for a reverse rotation tiller. I could really use a wider swath than just 48"
Not knocking the tillers, knocking the manufacturing marvel of overcharging for changing the position of the drive pinion to spin things the other direction....
AND in the case of the landpride, the addition of 'sifting' rods to catch the bigger things first to make sure they are buried under the fines that make it threw..... How bout' one of them on a forward rotation tiller???
A power rake works in reverse with excellent results, I would really like to know where the manufacture shoves 8 times more expense into the thing, compared to a like size tiller, wich a power rake is basically a naked tiller.... Same with the reverse tillers. Seems to be minimal features for astronomical prices, but not so much with the KK tiller it looks like.
ANYHOW, thanks for the responses, all info is good.