I would go with a 10 foot wide, un-notched blade, pull-type disc for a tractor of that size and sandy soil. Smooth blades last up to 4x longer, and notched style are not necessary in sandy soil. Most folks here relate more to 3 point discs which are far more common on CUT's, and an 8-foot 3-point would be the right size for that tractor. You are definitely on the right track with the pull-type disc, which do a far better job than a 3-point, the most significant improvement being aproximately 30% less fuel usage to do the same job, assuming equal weight per disc 3-point and pull-type. I have an 8-foot pull-type disc that is sized perfectly for, and I use often behind a 28 hp, Ford 8n tractor. I also use it on occasion behind a 20 hp Allis Chalmers C (a little bit much for on more aggressive settings), or a 46 hp, 4wd, JD 4120. Honestly, the JD does not even seem to know the disc is back there, even at the most aggressive cut angle, and could probably handle a 12-footer. It pulls that disc easily thru plowed ground at relatively high ground speed and the engine at idle speed, as long as the 4wd is engaged. Other than a front-loader, I can think of no implement that benefits more from 4wd than a disc. With your 4wd tractor, you can definitely bump up the disc size compared to what a 2wd tractor of the same weight could handle. Again, fuel economy comes into play here and your 4wd will get the discing job done using around 25% less fuel. If you add these two factors together (pull-type disc and 4wd), less than half the fuel can be used to do the job compared to a 2wd tractor with a 3-point disc. In these days of $4.00 diesel, I think folks are crazy trying to work any serious ammount of land with the latter.