Results 31 to 40 of 71
-
03-25-2012, 04:32 PM #31Elite Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 2,687
- Location
- Earth
- Tractor
- Deere
Oh no, your putting me up to a challenge
Originally Posted by catdozer

If/when I do I can't promise something as good as these.
-
03-25-2012, 04:56 PM #32Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 7,732
- Location
- somewhere usa
- Tractor
- stuff
Re: New landplane build for L&G and subcompacts
Had to know that the x749 could handle the IMatch and the landplane so tried it out. Works great, I raised it and stood on the front cross member to bounce it and the front wheels stayed on the ground. That is with just two front weights, so with four weights I should be good to go.
I built this plane to work with this mower. At 48" width and 405 lbs plus the IMatch should put me at about 115-120 lbs/ft.
-
03-25-2012, 06:04 PM #33Elite Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 2,687
- Location
- Earth
- Tractor
- Deere
-
03-25-2012, 06:21 PM #34Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 7,732
- Location
- somewhere usa
- Tractor
- stuff
Re: New landplane build for L&G and subcompacts
Martian,
I am finishing the welding on the underside then trying it out before paint.
-
03-25-2012, 07:18 PM #35
Re: New landplane build for L&G and subcompacts
Looks great Steve!
Yesterday I hit ROCK BOTTOM.....Today I started to DIG..
My Work & Stuff Photo Thread: http://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/p...to-thread.html
-
03-25-2012, 07:32 PM #36Veteran Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 1,658
- Location
- NorthEastern, VT
- Tractor
- Kubota L3010DT, Dresser TD7G Dozer
Re: New landplane build for L&G and subcompacts
Looks really good Steve. I especially like how you formed those skids.
One question though. I was wondering how much room you have between the top of the blade and the cross pieces. Do you think that if you get material built up in front of the blade it can get through that tight spot OK or are your cross pieces more forward than they look in the pictures ?"If you're not making any mistakes then you're not doing anything"
L3010DT, Farmi JL290 Winch, ATI Grapple, BearCat 5" Chipper, 6' Rear Blade,
7' Sickle Bar, 5' Land Plane Grading Scraper, Dresser TD7G Dozer
-
03-25-2012, 09:13 PM #37
Re: New landplane build for L&G and subcompacts
i noticed how your landplane seems like a better fit 48in than the others store bought brands. Now how about a TnT for that X749
Bobcat CT235 with Deere Imatch, And a very bad addiction of attachments
-
03-25-2012, 09:17 PM #38Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 7,732
- Location
- somewhere usa
- Tractor
- stuff
Re: New landplane build for L&G and subcompacts
Gordon, thanks for the reply and interest. There is a little over 4 inches clearance the material seems to flow across the blades well> Just gave it a test run, seems to work okay but I will need to get a hyd top link for it to work the best.
The blades are set flush with the skids for lawn prep work, that said it will still load up with gravel rather easily as in the first pic below. Made a couple of passes up and down the drive and grabbed another pic.
-
03-25-2012, 09:30 PM #39Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 7,732
- Location
- somewhere usa
- Tractor
- stuff
Re: New landplane build for L&G and subcompacts
Well I hope it works out well for smoothing beneath trees and tight spots, sure will save some labor costs.
I plan to add a hydraulic top link next week or so, just have to make some hard lines and get the diverter valve.. I could plug it in the second circuit as is but want to be able to use the front couplers for front mount equipment too.
-
03-25-2012, 09:49 PM #40
Re: New landplane build for L&G and subcompacts
That looks like it works Bad AZZ!
Ive got a freshly tore up yard you can come try it out on..... lol
1999 Kubota G1900 HST B2750 Dozer blade
Satoh S370D Beaver 4x4, 2 cyl Mitsu diesel, Custom FEL with Hay forks
Woods RB60, KK 48" BB, Woods RM59 CCW, 48" Brinly disc, Farmhand Carryall, AB 1 btm plow, AB HH/trailer mover
Angry Beaver Front End Loader build thread- Click Here



Reply With Quote

