Results 1 to 10 of 42
-
01-21-2013, 10:37 PM #1Gold Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 318
- Location
- West Granby CT
- Tractor
- JD 4105. 375 Backhoe. 2005 Polaris Ranger
Because the search engine sucks......Box Blade Question
For some reason the search engine on TractorByNet is difficult for me to use. I know there are a ton of box blade related threads and I read all that I could find. Does anyone else find the search "painful" or is it just me?
However, I ask anyhow......
I have a John Deere 4105 and want to get a box blade for the spring. I think it will be very useful for my fields, stone driveway, and future woods roads. The tractor is 40 hp with R4 tires making it about 66" wide. I don't really have a budget. I don't want to buy things twice and I don't want to waste money. I like Everything Attachments and their videos but that is all I really researched so far.
Questions - how wide should I go and what do y'all suggest for brands Etc, specifically for my tractor and needs.
Thanks.
-
01-21-2013, 10:56 PM #2Elite Member
Advertiser
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 5,897
- Location
- 4000\' mountains of Southern California
- Tractor
- Mahindra 7520, Mahindra 3215HST, Case 580 extendahoe, Case 310 dozer, Parsons trencher, Cat D6,
Re: Because the search engine sucks......Box Blade Question
72" wide and nothing less than 800lbs. Do you have any rear remotes? If you do, you might want to consider a hydraulic top link and or a hydraulic side link. They really let you make full use of a box blade and you will need that for those future woods roads.

Just my
-
01-21-2013, 11:05 PM #3Veteran Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 1,665
- Location
- SW VA
- Tractor
- David Brown 885, Kubota RTV 900, Kubota 9540
Treat me good and I'll treat you better, treat me bad and I'll treat you worse.
-
01-21-2013, 11:32 PM #4Veteran Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Posts
- 1,091
- Location
- Near Winnipeg, Mb, Canada
- Tractor
- John Deere 2305, 2320,Z465
Re: Because the search engine sucks......Box Blade Question
I'd say at least as wide as your tractor. I use an over sized one for my tractor on gravel and snow as it doesn't require much power yet for dirt work you will likely be run full throttle for a tractor width model so don't go too wide. Kind of balance between your specific needs.
For weight/quality, heavier is better but more money. Have you ever heard anyone say they wish they'd bought a lighter duty unit? Again balance, if your not a commercial/ daily user go mid line for weight and quality. the TSC box blade likely won't hold up to 40hp. Jmho.
Good luck and happy shopping.Carefull what you aim for, Aim for nothing and you will achieve it with amazing accuracy.
-
01-22-2013, 12:12 AM #5Silver Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 203
- Location
- Scarborough, ME
- Tractor
- Yanmar LX4500, Toro z420
Re: Because the search engine sucks......Box Blade Question
I'm using a TSC 72" Box blade and its held up fine for the 600 feet of driveway I've used it on. I've been completely ripping up the drives then spreading new gravel.
I've read a lot of box blade threads on TBN, the BBs that don't hold up are the ones that the operator admits they were going too fast or butting it into something the BB wasn't designed to move.
-
01-22-2013, 12:18 AM #6Elite Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Posts
- 4,662
- Location
- 62014 IL (outside STL MO)
- Tractor
- New holland TC(33)
Re: Because the search engine sucks......Box Blade Question
72".... a light duty BB will hold up fine under normal use. Only downside is they are short on weight, but thats easy to add and a lot less expensive than buying the weight upfront.
Steve - TC33D 4x4 FEL, dual rear remotes with toys
-
01-22-2013, 12:57 AM #7Platinum Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Posts
- 592
- Location
- Staunton, VA
- Tractor
- John Deere 3038E
Re: Because the search engine sucks......Box Blade Question
You could probably pull a 72 inch. I had a 72 on my JD 3038e and it was just a bit more than it's weight would handle. I downsized to a 60 inch and it's perfect. The tractor would pull the bigger BB on ordinary gravel and such, but not up my steep hills. If you don't have to grade a steep slope, you should have no problems with the 6 footer.
By the way, the BB is really of little use for snow. The box fills immediately and nothing much happens. You can run it in reverse as a push blade, but it is hard to steer and you are prone to hitting things that can bend supports on the BB. I speak from experience - 72 inch on a 68 hp JD.
-
01-22-2013, 01:25 AM #8Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 7,750
- Location
- somewhere usa
- Tractor
- stuff
Re: Because the search engine sucks......Box Blade Question
Buzzard,
Heres the three best choices i could come up with for your tractor.
Good, EA's 72" Severe Extreme duty boxblade
Better, Cammond 2C2 66"
Best, Woods Gannon HD2465LB 66"
Hope this helps and gives you a range of pricing to work with, i have to say the Gannon would be my choice. i don't recommend buying a light boxblade and adding weight to it. The extra weight should be part of the boxblade structure for strength.
How's the driveway repair biz going?
-
01-22-2013, 06:40 AM #9
Re: Because the search engine sucks......Box Blade Question
I have a Dirt Dog 72" rollover, it is heavy, 800 + lbs. and works great. It is a manual box as I could not justify the expense of a hydraulic one. More weight is definitely better. And, like the others match your implement to the tractor or you will most likely bend or break something.
-
01-22-2013, 06:48 AM #10
Re: Because the search engine sucks......Box Blade Question
Similar Threads
-
Another Box Blade Question
By wmonroe in forum AttachmentsReplies: 8Last Post: 04-05-2011, 11:38 PM -
Grading Box Blade Question
By ExpediteMike in forum Owning/OperatingReplies: 52Last Post: 03-03-2007, 05:57 PM -
Question about box blade use.
By N80 in forum AttachmentsReplies: 3Last Post: 04-17-2006, 10:09 PM -
5' box blade question
By slydog in forum Rural LivingReplies: 5Last Post: 01-01-2005, 06:44 PM -
Box Blade Question
By stevenf in forum AttachmentsReplies: 2Last Post: 10-31-2004, 07:18 PM


Reply With Quote


