Chipper Chipper Anatomy

   / Chipper Anatomy #1  

ADin

Bronze Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2005
Messages
98
Location
Indiana
Tractor
JD2305, 1948 B.F. Avery Model V
The more I look at the chipper options the more confusing things get. For example, on the MacKissic, do the large branches go through the knife, then hammers while the shedding only involves the hammers, etc. Looking at the photo this would appear to be the case. I have 30 year old 7HP chipper (given $free$) which is exactly opposite, hammers for chipping and blade/hammers for shredding. It doesn't work that well on anything above 1", but dull hammers could be a big part of that. With enough effort I might be able to locate new hammers but I'm not sure just how much difference it would make. I don't want to buy a new unit needlessly, but the current unit is a PITA as is.

Actually my bigger concern is surrounding the chipper throat designs. My current chipper has a throat of about 2 3/4" sq. What I find is that many things I would like to "shove" in won't because of twists and turns in the branches or side branches. If I have to prune the bulk of the side limbs first (e.g. hawthorne limbs), then I end up spending more time pruning than chipping. Looking at chippers like the MacKissic (3.5" and 4.5") they appear to have a little larger opening, but seems they would still have the same fundemental problem (e.g. how to shove in a 2.5" stick with .5" - 1" side branches?). Even most of the advertising photos show people chipper long straight limbs with no branches (we call that firewood around here). People here seem quite happy with their machines, but I can't resolve this point. I'm not keen on spending $1500+ for a chipper unless it's an order of magnitude better than the piece of junk I currently have. I liked the 6" Jinma for this reason, among several others, but sounds like it might be to big (weight) for my JD2305. Can anybody here comment on the level of pre-pruning needed before feeding limbs in the Mackissic, DR, etc.?

Last question - How big of material can be thrown in the shredders of these "Mackissic" class shreaders - 3/4", 1", etc? If the shreader can deal with minimum 1" material then that helps the mitigate the chipper throat limitation a bit above a bit. Of course my current chipper recommends 1/2" or less for the shredder making is mostly worthless for managing small side limbs.
 
   / Chipper Anatomy #2  
ADin,

I have had several smaller chipper-shredders and find, as you do, that they simply don't want to swallow limbs with significant side branches. If you want to process limbs without removing the side branches you need a much larger chipper with a large throat such as those available at rental yards. "Low-cost" chippers are usually effective only on small straight limbs with minimal side branches.

My current chipper-shredder is rated at 4.5 inches, but that really means that the limbs must be STRAIGHT with a maximum diameter of 4.5 inches. If these limbs have side branches, they must be very flexible or they need to be cut off and fed in separately. If I need to do larger stuff, I rent a big chipper unit from a rental store to get it done. The cost is not prohibitive.

The shredder part of the unit is intended for loose materials and small diameter brush and vegetation. It is not capable of handling large diameter limbs.

JackIL
 
   / Chipper Anatomy
  • Thread Starter
#3  
Hmmm - That's what I was afraid someone would say. For $500 - $1000 I could understand the limitations, but in the $1500 - $2500 range I would have hoped for a lot better. The use of cheap bushhog for chipping as discussed in other threads may be less civilized, but is now sounding like a much more efficient method if one has to burn or rent a bigger chipper for most of the 2"+ stuff anyways.
 
 
 
Top