littlejohn2009
New member
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2010
- Messages
- 17
I too grew up with a gravel operation. The use of a jaw was to crush the larger rock 12" plus, into about a 3-4". That product was fed into a roll crusher.
Using a jaw will require strong iron, as there is a significant impact. I remember when a particularly hard rock would enter the jaw there was a lot of banging. Jaw surfaces are also curved. As it was mentioned the rotating movement is in a manner to feed the rock into the jaw, but occasionally and hard rock, would fall in and be squeezed back out, propelling into the air.
The roll crusher is less stressful as the material is fed and into a small space between 2 rotating rollers, vs being banged together.
I would explore the roller idea before the jaw if I could as i think there will be less maintainaince .
In any case..good luck with your interesting project.
Using a jaw will require strong iron, as there is a significant impact. I remember when a particularly hard rock would enter the jaw there was a lot of banging. Jaw surfaces are also curved. As it was mentioned the rotating movement is in a manner to feed the rock into the jaw, but occasionally and hard rock, would fall in and be squeezed back out, propelling into the air.
The roll crusher is less stressful as the material is fed and into a small space between 2 rotating rollers, vs being banged together.
I would explore the roller idea before the jaw if I could as i think there will be less maintainaince .
In any case..good luck with your interesting project.