log splitter wedge design

[wowbw7]

any theories from you guys on why log splitter wedges are shaped the way they are? it seems to me that rather than have a straight vertical sharpened edge, the wedge would require much less force to 'start' the split if the front edge were to have a more arrow-point shape (not as pronounced, of course, maybe 10-20 degrees of tilt ). the force to start the split would be reduced by having a 'pointy' wedge. watching splitters operate, there is the initial 'pop' to start the splitting action, probably the first inch of the stroke, followed by the spreading action which takes much less force. i compare it to cutting a piece of steak with a knife. pushing straight down with the knife doesn't work and would require a large force, but using the point of the knife to pierce the steak is easy. i've seen forged steel wedges on splitters but they, too, have vertical cutting edges. but i have seen 4-way drop-on wedges that have the wings tapered back. why not the main cutting edge? any theories other that cost to manufacture?

 

[mwb]

I don't know what you would do if you stuck an arrow shaped wedge into a tough old twisted piece and go it stuck. At least the straight wedge will not penetrate to the point that you can't remove it. Kind of like trying to split wood with a limbing axe.

I think that if the machine does not have enough force to split with the straight wedge then the arrow point will not gain you anything except having to burn your firewood on the splitter.

Also, the straight wedge will allow you to split any diameter of wood; using a pointed wedge means you have to suspend smaller or odd shaped pieces until it has been penetrated. Sounds like a good opportunity for a crushed hand.

 

[denmansoft]

Theory:
angled or pointed leading edge would allow or cause, some peices of wood to move or slide until the cutting edge has dug in. You don't want it moving once the pressure starts to build.

 

[bjcsc]

any theories from you guys on why log splitter wedges are shaped the way they are? it seems to me that rather than have a straight vertical sharpened edge, the wedge would require much less force to 'start' the split if the front edge were to have a more arrow-point shape (not as pronounced, of course, maybe 10-20 degrees of tilt ). the force to start the split would be reduced by having a 'pointy' wedge. watching splitters operate, there is the initial 'pop' to start the splitting action, probably the first inch of the stroke, followed by the spreading action which takes much less force. i compare it to cutting a piece of steak with a knife. pushing straight down with the knife doesn't work and would require a large force, but using the point of the knife to pierce the steak is easy. i've seen forged steel wedges on splitters but they, too, have vertical cutting edges. but i have seen 4-way drop-on wedges that have the wings tapered back. why not the main cutting edge? any theories other that cost to manufacture?

You are correct about it being way more efficient. The sliding problem is solved by a tip at the top. This style of wedge has been around awhile. Here's a pic of the business end of mine, notice the wings and main edge:

 

[john_bud]

The edge looks like an ax head. Curved just a bit.

 

[wowbw7]

now that makes sense. so is cost the reason for not using this design? too expensive to machine the curved edge?

 

[bjcsc]

now that makes sense. so is cost the reason for not using this design? too expensive to machine the curved edge?

I don't know, but I doubt it. I built mine myself, but the wedge is nothing exotic - just this kit from Northern Tool...

That said, it does work very well!

 

[SPYDERLK]

any theories from you guys on why log splitter wedges are shaped the way they are? it seems to me that rather than have a straight vertical sharpened edge, the wedge would require much less force to 'start' the split if the front edge were to have a more arrow-point shape (not as pronounced, of course, maybe 10-20 degrees of tilt ). the force to start the split would be reduced by having a 'pointy' wedge. watching splitters operate, there is the initial 'pop' to start the splitting action, probably the first inch of the stroke, followed by the spreading action which takes much less force. i compare it to cutting a piece of steak with a knife. pushing straight down with the knife doesn't work and would require a large force, but using the point of the knife to pierce the steak is easy. i've seen forged steel wedges on splitters but they, too, have vertical cutting edges. but i have seen 4-way drop-on wedges that have the wings tapered back. why not the main cutting edge? any theories other that cost to manufacture?

I built my moving wedge with a "point" directly in line with the ram. The wedge cutting edge tapers back about 1/2" above and below this. It works well and with 18T splits everything. I do notice tho, that the point starts the split and then very often the top of the wedge does not enter the split but instead enters next to it causing a sliver to split from the main part. Im sure the point is a benefit in starting the split, but I cant tell that its needed, and the slivers are a bit frustrating unless you need plenty of kindling.
larry

 

[wowbw7]

so BJCSC, in your opinion, would it make sense to you, for me to buy one of Northern Tools' 10 inch wedges and grinding it to a profile similar to the one you have? I'm building a splitter in the spring and i want to get it right the first time, while trying to keep costs down .

 

[Cord]

I don't know if you need to think about this so much. We're talking about the power of hydraulics here. If you select a 4" cylinder and decent parts that will push to 3,000psi, you'll have more than enough power. If you buy cheap parts that can't produce pressure, then you need to get inventive with your wedge design.

Personally, I hate slow splitters. While using my dad's painfully slow $800 splitter, I got to thinking about the process of splitting. I thought to myself "why do people think of log splitting like they are trying to split the wood with a wedge and maul?" The more I thought about it, the more I like the idea of trying to extrude the wood, instead of splitting it. Yep, I built a wood extruder, not a splitter! The first time my neighbor saw my creation, he immediatly dismissed it, saying "that'll never work!" Oh, how wrong he was! The head that I built is around 16" wide. It first splits the wood horizontally and then splits the bottom half 3 more times. For each pass of the splitter I get 4 pieces of wood. When the push plate cycles back the area is clear and I slide the nsplit half back. No having to catch and hold pieces so you can resplit them. To run this splitter you must have a 5" ram and 3,000psi of pressure. Anything less, won't work. Using it on dry wood (elm, oak, maple, hickory, etc), it has never jammed. I have jammed it with green box elder though (not my wood). Is it fast? **** yea! This splitter requires 3 people to operate. One works the controls and positions the pieces. Another brings the chunks in and the third person clears the splitter of pieces. Everybody is always busy. If you wanted to stack the pieces, you'd need a 4th person because there isn't enough time to stack. With this splitter we managed to split 14 full cords of wood in 2 long days.