Hate to be a spoilsport for a good project,,,,,,but I do exactly what that that guy's doing all the time, with a string-trimmer that has a skilsaw blade on it. I can reach higher, reach lower, cut many more angles, cut each branch in a more sensible way, including flush-cut at ground level, and cut much faster. And not leave any eye-pokers.:shocked:
I can also reduce a cut branch to 1-foot chunks in seconds, and not have to pick it up. TING TING TING TING. Done. I tried a 10" carbide blade, it was heavy, took awhile to spool up and seemed very dangerous, I like the 7 1/4" skilsaw size. Plus I have a stack of old skilsaw blades, so it's almost zero cost.
More description on post
56 of this other thread
I recently bought a new echo PAS266
View attachment 396562 with the quick-attach system - and a 3 foot 'extension', I can cut 11 feet high. I have the chainsaw attachment too, for bigger stuff. The skilsaw is much faster and much lighter than the chainsaw on anything less than 2". Out on the end of a 6 foot (or 9 foot) pole the chainsaw weight makes a huge difference, as well as the speed, how long you have to hold position.
Having both is good, especially if you get one stuck you can unhook and cut it out with the other. I find the skilsaw blade to be far easier to use, and can work many more hours than with the chainsaw attachment (due to weight and cut speed). Plus you can cut bushes flush at ground level with the skilsaw.
Here's how I attached the skilsaw blade. Don't even bother testing echo's 'brush blade', you need carbide. You just touch the branch, and TING, TING TING it's gone.
View attachment 396557 View attachment 396558 View attachment 396559
View attachment 396560 View attachment 396561
Sorry for going off-topic, depends if you want to build something, or cut brush. If you want to cut brush, I'm certain the string trimmer option is better.