Jim Timber
Veteran Member
I've got a hydraulic motor I'm not going to use for a skidding winch after all, and I just bought a 21x3/4" steel disc for my wheel (76#). I'm going for a loader mounted unit (SSQA) and will run the motor off the rear remote via bungee and will use my 3rd function to swing the arm. It's pretty easy building/designing to this point - but what I don't know is how many teeth I should use?
I can get Greenteeth and pockets locally for a reasonable price, so I think that's the route I'm going to go. The salesman at CEI said he didn't think the 500's would handle the hydraulic power and to go with 700's at a minimum, claiming 500's would explode. I'm used to 3 teeth in the cut at all times from machining, but is there any rule with stump cutting? Lots of the smaller machines have 4 sets of teeth 90 out from each other. Larger pro grinders use double that and up. How do you determine when you're just wasting money on more teeth?
I'm also torn on if I should have it pulling the cut towards the tractor or throwing the chips away? Seems like it'd be easier to see if it was throwing them out, and less chances of getting a rock chucked back at the tractor, but there's merit in not putting that torque down on the loader arms.
Thoughts?
I can get Greenteeth and pockets locally for a reasonable price, so I think that's the route I'm going to go. The salesman at CEI said he didn't think the 500's would handle the hydraulic power and to go with 700's at a minimum, claiming 500's would explode. I'm used to 3 teeth in the cut at all times from machining, but is there any rule with stump cutting? Lots of the smaller machines have 4 sets of teeth 90 out from each other. Larger pro grinders use double that and up. How do you determine when you're just wasting money on more teeth?
I'm also torn on if I should have it pulling the cut towards the tractor or throwing the chips away? Seems like it'd be easier to see if it was throwing them out, and less chances of getting a rock chucked back at the tractor, but there's merit in not putting that torque down on the loader arms.
Thoughts?