|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southwestern PA
Posts: 8
|
OK...this is tough. I've got ~18+ hilly acres to care for and want to do some plowing and tilling on about 1 acre this year.... I've owned diesel engines, I've driven tractors but have never owned one or used one routinely. We have a good dealer here in town dealing in NH and Mahindra and I'm torn between a TC48DA and the Mahindra 5530.. I know these don't seem comparable..and thats my dilemma...TC48 seems to have the power I need, but the mahindra got an xtra ton in weight on it. I've driven both and you can feel the firmness of the weighty mahindra which feels good. On the tc48, there's a lot of fiberglass(or plastic) which wont rust, but doesn't seem as sturdy...of course the manhindra's finish is not as nice with ample spots of metal to rust. The mahindras got 24's in front vs. 16s on the NH. Ok, I've looked at deere..the 5203 probably makes the most sense, but I might as well buy the mahindra as it is an Indian made tractor too and I'm confident the mahindra facility in india has been making tractors longer than deere...in india that is. I haven't really looked at kubota...a lot lighter...maybe I should. I'm looking to put a loader on whatever I get and pull a 72" brush hog behind it...
I'm sure I'm not the first to have this dilemma...interested in getting thoughts. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: central New York
Posts: 2,801
|
The Kubota's lighter weight makes it nice to add the ballast where it is needed for the loads you might be carrying. With the high cost of fuel fat tractors make big dents in the wallet everytime you start an engine. There are differences in engines but for every ton you can figure about a gallon of fuel when using the tractor under load.
We've been changing the way we set up tractors for a while and for most users we've even seen extended tire wear to the point of double although for many people depending on the brand by the time 1000 hours have come around they might be trading. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 501
|
Having too many choices is a good thing.
The dealer I purchased my Kubota from also sells Mahindra. I talked to the service department regarding the reliability of the Mahindra and as a whole they cannot say anything bad about the tractor. Well, they did pick on how it sounded but that was about it. The best way to make your final decision is to do exactly what you're doing - test drive the tractors and test drive the dealers. Buy the tractor that will make you happy at the price you feel is reasonable. Myself, I lean towards the Kubota and John Deere based on experience with the tractors and the local dealer support. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 160
|
They are all good tractors. The 5203 probably is more in line with the Mahindra that the NH. In my own world I would prefer the metal over the plastic and fiberglass. Keep testing them and you seemed to prefer the Mahindra If that's what you feel, I would say go with that decision, I don't think you will be disappointed. I bought the 5203 myself, but I did that because of the JD support here in my area.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Super Star Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Central florida
Posts: 18,689
|
I generally like metal hoods over fiberglass.. but both can be fixed.. thought he metal will surely have a longer service life if you look to the extremes.
What's the price difference between the NH to the MAH? The weight can be good or bad. bad if you are getting ground compaction.. or trailer it alot. Good if you need it though.. For only 1 ac.. what you using.. a 2-14 plow? Anything you mentioned will pull one. soundguy |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Northern VA, USA
Posts: 1,106
|
Just a quick note....The 5203 is a 3 cyl with Turbo, the Mahindra is a 4 cyl naturally aspirated...I personnally prefer natural with extra cubic inches (there ain't no substitute for cubic inches...). The big thing is that the 5530 has a shuttle shift...pretty much a must if you desire an FEL. I believe the Deere is a 9F/3R with no reverser. I never understood about a shuttle till I drove my BILs little Kubota, then got my 6000 Mahindra...believe me, no matter what you pick make it with a shuttle shift...BobG in VA
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southwestern PA
Posts: 8
|
thanks for all the feedback and comments. I think I've narrowed it down to Kubota...the fit and finish just seems to be a higher quality. The shuttle shift is nice on the M Series and, of course, the hydrostatic is as simple as it gets on the L series. I'm leaning toward the M....50 or 60HP with FEL and a 72" cutter. No real break for buying the cutter from the kubota dealer so I'll probably shop around... but all in the all , the dealer has a very good rep and seems very responsible and reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Elite Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: S. IN
Posts: 3,833
|
Kubota makes fine tractors and has a stellar reputation. I've had tractors from Kubota, John Deere as well as New Holland. All have been good tractors and I'd buy another from any of those companies in the future if the need arises. I have nothing bad to say about the Mahindra, it's just that I have not owned one so I can't comment on one first hand. Good luck with your new Kubota!
__________________
1982 19" Murray push mower (upgraded to B&S 8 hp engine!) Weed Eater 25cc string trimmer w/ curved shaft! 1978 Ford pickup, stick shift, 300ci 6 cyl *new rear U joint* 2006 Harbor Freight claw hammer *new* 2008 Harbor Freight pipe bender. Not sure what I'm going to do with it, but my dad figured I needed it for my B'day. 2008 Harbor Freight package of blue nitrile gloves (yup, from my dad too) ![]() Have you ever noticed that the more you learn, the more you realize what you don't know? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 31
|
Well after doing a lot of research, it seems that Deere makes the most heavy duty tractors. They might cost more, but in this case, you get what you pay for. I was researching new tractors and decided to get a Deere.
Last edited by Raptor53; 04-26-2008 at 04:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 9,500
|
I wish I had your problem Jackster!
If you plan on much loader work try out an HST to see how it compares to the other transmissions for ease of work. ![]()
__________________
Egon 50 years behind the times Livin in a Worn out skin bag filled with rattlin bones |
|
|
|
![]() |
||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| About TractorByNet.com | Terms of Service | Advertise | © 2008 TractorByNet.com |