|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 714
|
Quote:
Loader is different. Bobcat uses a Rhino loader I believe. Also I would be shocked to see Bobcat build the larger models, anything larger than the DK45 would shock me . . . if indeed they go that large. That would put them in the AG market and I just don't see it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wakefield, NH
Posts: 903
|
Quote:
The tractor is the same but the attachments (loader & backhoe) are different. Rhino loaders and I don't know who makes the backhoe. Also, I beleive the Rhino loaders have less lift capacities than the Kioti loaders.
__________________
Derek Kioti CK20HST KL120 FEL // KB2365 BH // 60" JRW 3ph snowblower // 48" HD Boxblade Sims-Cab Depot heated cab Pics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Port Deposit, MD
Posts: 251
|
Quote:
You sure about "Best parts availability?" http://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/j...-way-move.html Based on the guy's signature, it's a '95 and he can't get a steering arm for it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) | |
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 355
|
Quote:
Of course HP is a factor when buying a tractor. But, today marketeers use it hype up a tractor, like most of the cheap riders you can buy today. Years ago, before all this hype, most lawn tractors were 10 - 12 HP. Those old "low horse power" machines will out perform most of todays 18 - 24 HP machines. It's not just about HP, but how it's applied. For CUTS (CT120) and subCuts (2305), the HP is only part of the equation. The real business end of these is the tranny and the hydraulics. That is why it is important to look at all the specifications, AND TO DRIVE THEM. You may find that while the CT120 is "more tractor", it may be more than you want and you like the smaller size of the 2305. Or you find just the opposite. The point is that these two tractors are really two different beasts altogether. The 2305 is more in line with the Kubota BX's, and other subcuts offered by New Holland, Massey, and the like. I'm not sure Deere really has a machine right now in a new model that is directly comparable to the CT120. All of these machines are quality products. So, then it's not unlike buying a Chevy versus a Ford - personal preference. But, you must drive them, and study the specs so that you can make the best informed decision for YOU. Having said this, buy a bit bigger than you think you need. Don't buy too small and then regret it, regardless of color. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 408
|
BTL- I bought it used, I have only had it a few months. So far it has done all I have asked of it. The loaded rear tires do add enough extra weight so I need to be a little mindful of how dry the lawn is before I go across it. The Kioti is a heavy machine, the loaded tires just make it that much heavier. If you are looking for a machine to mow with, or spend lots of time on your lawn... it might be too heavy for that, a Kubota or JD would be better. I didn't like the ergonomics of the Kubota, otherwise I probably would have gone with the Kubota. I did get the Kioti cheaper than I would have gotten the Kubota, but Kubota has a very good dealer 10 miles away. My nearest dealer is 55 miles away and is not rumored to be the best. So far I have not needed a dealer so no issue. There are also lots of great online dealers ready to help, one even on Sunday's.
The Bobcat is a Kioti machine, same assembly line, different color, different loader. I am guessing Bobcat is using a different loader to not associate themselves with the issue that Kioti had with cracking loaders on the smaller machines, CK20-35, until they redesigned the loaders. The only item that needs to be addressed on my machine is the backhoe was used heavily and one of the hoses has some wear on it from rubbing on the boom where it goes inside the boom and I should replace it in the next few months. The Kioti does have some features as standard that are options on other machines, which helps to add value to the machine. The JD machines do have features that make adding/removing implements easier.. but at a large cost. I still check out other machines and I have not found one that I like better, or a better value than the Kioti. It fits ME well, it might not fit YOU. You do need to go try out as many different tractors as you can, even ones you have no interest in. You might find some feature that you really like, or dislike. That is where I found what machines fit me best and the ones that just didn't work for me ergonomically. You need to find which one you are comfortable with as YOU will be the one to spend lots of time in the seat.HTH
__________________
Jim - Husky 4814WB- 48" walk behind lawn mower. For my 1.5 acres of lawn. - '06 Kioti CK30 HST - KL130 loader w/reinforcing bracket, SS QA, LK3054 QA bucket, engine coolant heater, dual rear remotes, KB2375 Backhoe w/thumb, 7ft 6 way rear blade, chains front/rear, loaded rear tires. For eveything else. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 329
|
Quote:
So, when comparing models you may find weight to be a bigger advantage.
__________________
I thank God for these gifts: Mahindra 2615 HST w/loader, Markham tooth bar, BrushHog SQ60 rotary cutter, BrushHog 3507 angle blade. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) |
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Batavia, NY
Posts: 566
|
I'm sorry if I misled you a bit, but I got you thinking. In general what I was trying to get accross was that for the loader and ground engagement work that you are planning on doing, the heaver tractor (Bobcat Kioti) will out do the lighter tractor even with more HP. Be sure you compare your lift capacities and lift capacities, as more will make your tractor more efficient and useful.
While I am here, I will suggest you check out the Mahindra 2415 or 2516 tractors, as the 0% for 60 month financing makes it an attractive bargain. Very nice tractor for the money.
__________________
Galen LaWall Your Mahindra Tractor Dealer 185 Pearl Street Batavia, New York 14020 585.343.0770 |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |
|
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mt Washington, Kentucky
Posts: 5,067
|
Quote:
Bobcat is targeting the industrial tractor market, not the ag world. Anyone who's trying to garner a piece of the industrial tractor pie is competing with Caterpillar/Challenger and Deere for the most part. As an example, Deere is just now releasing an 85 HP small-framed tractor/loader w/3-point hitch based on the 110 loader/backhoe chassis. There's a lot of use for tractors above 45 hp in the construction world. It wouldn't be a stretch at all to see a Bobcat model well above 45 hp. In the construction industry, it's VERY common to see equipment leased. Bobcat has a successful lease program. I'd suspect they'll put quite a few of their "new" tractors in the field through that avenue.
__________________
There are three kinds of men; 1.) The ones that learn by reading 2.) The few who learn by observation 3.) The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | |
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 714
|
Quote:
That makes sense. So are you saying to expect a white/red DK55/65 clone? Or something built using them as a basis? I call the DK55/65/90 AG tractors and I don't see them being used in the Industrial world without modification to make them "industrial" ready. However, if Bobcat is going to use them as a starting point to build there own higher hp industrial range, that make sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Funk, Ohio
Posts: 2,320
|
In all this, I see very little mention of the features that seemed big when I was shopping. The proximity and quality of the dealer are important, of course, but other factors that I tossed around before settling on the Case included:
Transmission controls -- Deere made a big deal over their 2 pedal HST versus the rocker pedal Seat -- size, height, adjustability, angle, etc. Kubota seats made me feel like I was falling forward off the seat. Kioti made me feel like I was standing up. Deere had the highest back, good some of the time, bad other times as when looking behind the tractor. CNH had a good firm seat, tough cover, and it pivots. Loader controls -- how far do you need to reach when operating the thing? Overall height -- the Kubota and Deere ROPS in my size machine were sufficiently high that I would be constantly lowering them to get the tractor in the garage/shop door. With the Case, I had to crank a couple of extra turns into the spring to raise the door a little higher, but it fits. Reachable service items -- fule filler, filters, dipsticks, radiator, etc. With and without the loader in place. Vulnerabilty of hoses, wires, etc. on the belly of the machine. Several brands have the fuel filter hanging so low I just knew I would break it off on a log or rock running around in my woods. Ditto hydraulic hoses. Know how and where you will use the tractor, then look it over for things that might be damaged during use. Sit the seats and reach for the controls you will use a lot. Measure the height and width of the openings you need to drive through. Prioritize your uses literally, on paper, giving a value to each. Then go sit, drive, talk, look, walk around the dealership, etc. For me, it was pretty much up in the air between Kubota, Deere, CNH after eliminating several others for various reasons ranging from dealer location to perceived weakness of design for my use. I finally decided on a machine after visiting a dealer and being treated very graciously by a guy who sold 3 brands with no personal bias toward any of them. He told me the Kubota would be excellent, the Case maybe not quite so good, and the Cadet less so. Even with that, he owned and drove Case for his personal uses. I sat, measured, drove, and chose the Case. No complaints in 300 hours.
__________________
Rich 300 hours on the DX29, 850 on the JD 240 and too many to count on the Cadet Funk, Ohio |
|
|
|
![]() |
||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| About TractorByNet.com | Terms of Service | Advertise | © 2008 TractorByNet.com |