|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 19
|
Hi, I'm looking to make a purchase this week and its basically narrowed down to the New Holland TT60A and the Kubota MX5100, both 2WD, mostly to be used for 72 inch bush hog and FEL (light to medium duty) work, but mostly cutting at this time. Prices are really close. Any input as to which model would be best? Thanks is advance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Bronze Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oakdale, TN
Posts: 51
|
I'm a kubota fan but I just compared the specs on these two and for your purposes I would probably go with the blue tractor.
TT60A advantages: More PTO power, 47 vs. 44 Better hydraulics, 10.8 gpm vs. 9.5 gpm 540 pto @ 1967 rpm vs 2700 rpm for kubota (big difference here) longer wheelbase 81.7" vs. 74.6" heavier 4540 lbs. vs. 3369 lbs. bigger rear tire 14.9 - 28 vs. 14.9 - 26. The kubota does have some advantages as well: interim tier 4 motor, runs clean 8x8 transmission vs 8x2 mechanical shuttle shift hydraulic pto, wet pto clutch lighter (possible advantage if you need a lighter machine for some applications) tighter turning radius, more maneuverable I think you should test drive both. I think the kubota engine runs at about 2700 rpm for a 540 pto speed, check it out to see what it's like. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 445
|
those Kubota MX's seem to be selling more then the New Holland TT series, as far as these boards go. I've been looking for posts from owners of a NH TT series because I would like to hear some feedback from them but it seems there just aren't that many as there are MX owners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Va/WV
Posts: 917
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 445
|
Quote:
what is the first year of the MX series? wasn't the MX5000 the first model, followed by the current MX5100? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 19
|
I ended up going with the MX5100, as the dealer worked with me much more on pricing and with my trade than the NH dealer. I got it with FWD, FEL with quick attach, grill guard, and dual rear remotes. Only 6-7 hours on so far but no problems and runs my SQ172 with ease and my 6 year old son is able to sit on my lap, buckle up, and operate the FEL while I'm driving the tractor. Wish the fuel tank was a little larger but that's my only complaint at this point.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| About TractorByNet.com | Terms of Service | Advertise | © 2008 TractorByNet.com |