slewisma
Silver Member
It has not been my experience that self powered chippers of EQUAL quality cost less than PTO driven versions. For example Goossen makes the same chipper self powered and PTO driven. Self powered is more expensive.
I completely agree. However there isn't a PTO model that matches my needs. I'm talking about value, not quality and performance in the abstract. For my needs, the choices are:
a) Buy way more chipper than I need in a PTO model
b) Buy something that has enough performance and capacity for my needs
Believe me, if there was a lower cost, lower performance PTO based chipper that would suit my needs, I'd buy it in a heartbeat for all the reasons you added, especially the maintenance and bad gasoline issues.
I only need to run a chipper a few times a year at best for modest amounts of brush. This year I might've kept one busy for a whole weekend because of ice storms over the winter but that is not a typical year.
To your point, the Goosen is less than $4,000 for PTO and over $8,000 for self-powered. To my point, the Troy-Bilt or Earthquake that is all I need is self-powered and runs around $900. So for me and my needs, the lowest cost PTO model is still ~$3,000 more than an alternative that is acceptable for my use.
Maybe I shouldn't have asked why the PTO models cost more than the models with engines so much as why there are not smaller PTO models. But that gets to the question of whether someone with my needs really needs a "real" tractor and I don't want to go near that question!