Results 11 to 18 of 18
-
05-06-2010, 10:45 PM #11Platinum Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 737
- Location
- Buckhannon, WV
- Tractor
- 1947 Ford 2N and 2003 Kubota B7500
-
05-07-2010, 11:16 AM #12Gold Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 297
- Location
- pa
- Tractor
- Kubota L48 Kobelco sk100 Kobelco sko35 case 450 Mack R600
Re: Power King vs. Farmall Cub
I have a 49 Farmall cub that i mow with all the time a couple of other things i can mow just as quick with it as any garden tractor I have ever had and it only uses about a third of the fuel (gas) and my yard is anything but flat
-
05-07-2010, 07:02 PM #13Epic Contributor
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Posts
- 42,074
- Location
- Central florida
- Tractor
- ym1700, NH7610S, Ford 8N, 2N, NAA, 660, 850 x2, 541, 950, 951, 2000, 3000, 4000, 4600, 5000, 740, IH 'C' 'H', CUB, John Deere 'B', allis 'G', case VAC
Re: Power King vs. Farmall Cub
is your mower the IH 44" one?
soundguy
-
05-07-2010, 07:26 PM #14Platinum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 715
Re: Power King vs. Farmall Cub
My vote is the cub.I,v had them and were very good little tractors.They use very little fuel,parts are still easy to find and you can still find impl. for them.Plus there just cute.
Dave
-
05-07-2010, 10:34 PM #15
Re: Power King vs. Farmall Cub
I have 2 Cubs and many of the attachments.. My vote would be for the Cub over the PK, but I love my Ford 4WD 1715 with a FEL...
-
05-01-2012, 10:02 PM #16
Re: Power King vs. Farmall Cub
I'd go with the cub. It's a long love affair.
-
04-16-2013, 10:50 AM #17New Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 1
- Location
- Millington,tn
- Tractor
- IH Cub
Re: Power King vs. Farmall Cub
Are you sure the Cub does not have hydraulics? I see the rod to operate the rear rockshaft but no hand lever to operate it. That indicates it does have hydraulics. The front rockshaft would be near the current battery location and would be attached to the lift chains for the mower deck. The operating lever is next to the throttle.
Additionally, the Cub engine was built from 1947 thru 1979 or so, as were many of the other components. Probably explains why there are so many parts available.....Last edited by c cyrus; 04-16-2013 at 10:53 AM. Reason: additional info
-
04-22-2013, 05:08 PM #18Silver Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Posts
- 122
- Location
- Thornville, Ohio
- Tractor
- Searching
Re: Power King vs. Farmall Cub
Properly maintained, there is good reason to believe you could pass on the Cub to a grandchild.
-
04-23-2013, 01:27 AM #19Gold Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Posts
- 358
- Location
- Darlington, SC
- Tractor
- 1957 Ferguson 35, 1977? Yanmar 2200, 1963 Cub Cadet Original
Re: Power King vs. Farmall Cub
If it were me I'd go for the Cub too.
I did look over a Power King at a small tractor show just last weekend, interesting lil tractor. But I still would take the cub.
I also think that Cub has hydraulics, another plus for the Cub.modify, adjust and improvise....a country boy can survive
Similar Threads
-
Yanmar Specifications
By pennwalk in forum YanmarReplies: 28Last Post: 10-05-2011, 01:38 AM -
Hydraulic motor pto power king
By gottractor?79 in forum HydraulicsReplies: 9Last Post: 07-13-2009, 07:48 AM -
1969 Power King
By mjdtexan in forum General Vintage TractorsReplies: 9Last Post: 05-09-2009, 01:45 PM -
cub yanmar ex3200 power beyond
By cowdoc in forum Cub Cadet Yanmar & CUTsReplies: 12Last Post: 02-07-2009, 09:41 AM -
Goodbye Kubota, Hello Power Trac
By MChalkley in forum Power TracReplies: 107Last Post: 05-20-2002, 04:52 AM



Reply With Quote
