Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Silver Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    SE MI and SW OH
    Current Kioti CK27HST and Cub Cadet 1810. Previous NH1510 Hydro, AC D14, Oliver 1355?, and JD 314 Lawn Tractor

    Default CUT Engines Direct vs. indirect injection

    I am starting to look into purchasing a CUT after a few years without one. I have looked at the specifications for the following: NH 33D, kubota L3130 and 2910, and JD 4410. I was surprised to find that only the JD uses a direct fuel injection engine. Both NH and Kubota are still using Indirect fuel injection. I thought direct injection would offer improved fuel consumption, power, and cold temperature starting. Any thoughts on why the CUT engines are not all using direct fuel injection. Cost of upgrading the current engines is the only reason I can think of.

    Thanks for any thoughts.

  2. #2
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Ft. Worth, Tx
    access to our whole Kubota fleet

    Default Re: CUT Engines Direct vs. indirect injection

    I think one of the reasons kubota has gone to indirect injection with the new E-TVCS engines is to lower emission levels. This is something the marketplace is driving. Many of our Municipality customers are begining to look for lower emission diesel engines in tractors and mowers. Also, they run quieter.

  3. #3
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Badlands of Alberta

    Default Re: CUT Engines Direct vs. indirect injection

    Yep,them little engines seem to need the ID to meet EPA and Tier l regulations let alone Tier ll.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
© 2016 TractorByNet is a registered trademark of IMC Digital Universe, Inc. Other trademarks on this page are the property of their respective owners.