Results 71 to 80 of 111
-
07-31-2011, 12:07 PM #71
Re: Deere 5083E limited VS. Kubota M8540
Foreman, If you click on the links, you'll see that I'm comparing roughly equal tractors, not the one's you quoted. There aren't many Kubota tests due to Kubota not submitting machines or not meeting criteria to be tested. It is an AG tractor testing facility.
Daryl, I'll remit that the lighter weight may be the only extenuating parameter which would be advantageous for haying/pto usage and fuel consumption but not for ground engagement. Nebraska tests are done to laboratory specs and are probably the only way to distinguish between facts and poppycock. I'm not knocking Kubota. Just misinformation. I like Kubotas too, it's just that my JD dealer is so close and they take such good care of me. Call 'em from work and they'll leave parts out by the HVAC on the side of the building to be paid for when I can get there during working hours.
PS, for whatever reasons, they've had 2 Kubota 9000's MFWD traded in for deeres in the last 3 years. OTOH, I've seen deere traded in at Kubota dealers....different strokes for different folks.
Another local dealer says Deutz is not importing tractors this year due to the economy. He has even offered to let them use his land as a no cost staging area for a year if they want.You can put a gold saddle on a donkey but it's still a donkey.
-
07-31-2011 12:07 PM # ADS
-
07-31-2011, 12:26 PM #72Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 7,869
- Location
- somewhere usa
- Tractor
- stuff
Re: Deere 5083E limited VS. Kubota M8540
After spending a few minutes searching the Nebraska test reports available online currently I think Kyle picked the best tractors to compare from what tests are available. If anyone wants to pay the $35 dollar fees per report I am sure you can get a closer comparison and match.
I would liike to see reports on the Kubota 8540 and deere 5083E to make a direct comparison, just for the record.
-
07-31-2011, 05:45 PM #73Gold Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 429
- Location
- Oakdale, TN
- Tractor
- Kubota M8540HD ROPS
Re: Deere 5083E limited VS. Kubota M8540
I looked at the links provided for the Nebraska tests and came to a slightly different conclusion. If you look at operating the engines to get 540 PTO rpm speed the kubota makes more power and burns less fuel than the Deere.
Kubota: 79.4 HP at 2205 engine rpm which gives 540 PTO rpm and consumes 4.87 gallons of fuel per hour.
JD: 76.6 HP at 2400 engine rpm which gives PTO speed 538 rpm and consumes 4.93 gallons per hour.
The kubota test was performed in 1998. The JD is a newer model and the test was performed in 2009.Kubota M8540HD ROPS, LA1353 FEL
-
07-31-2011, 06:02 PM #74
-
07-31-2011, 08:34 PM #75Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 7,869
- Location
- somewhere usa
- Tractor
- stuff
-
07-31-2011, 09:43 PM #76
Re: Deere 5083E limited VS. Kubota M8540
I was just saying in my softest voice I just didnt see any reason to look at the test.I would if it was the one between these two tractors cause I have the 7040 and would like to see what one comes out better.I regret not getting the 8540 and a batwing thats it,nothing more than that

Im not against any of the other brands,open to all!!!
-
07-31-2011, 10:02 PM #77Elite Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Posts
- 4,866
- Location
- Michigan, S.E. Monroe County
- Tractor
- Kubota M9000 Hyd shuttle/Massey 1085
Re: Deere 5083E limited VS. Kubota M8540
Kubota M9000HDCC3
Kubota 105S
"If haying was easy, everyone would do it. It isn't."
-
07-31-2011, 10:25 PM #78Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 7,869
- Location
- somewhere usa
- Tractor
- stuff
Re: Deere 5083E limited VS. Kubota M8540
I am not against any of them either but my preferences would be for deere and Kubota. As I mentioned in an earlier post I suspect the fuel differences would be a wash.
For me it was easy to choose Deere as the Kubota dealer is about 125 miles away from me. New Mexico's population density is low enough you have to travel for almost everything. I don't know where the nearest MF dealer is but it isn't anywhere close. My Boston Whaler boat dealer is south of Denver about 550 miles away. This is just to give some examples that people in the eastern side of the US don't have to consider.
The only tractor I have ever had that I disliked was an IH 460 gas burner.
-
07-31-2011, 11:09 PM #79
Re: Deere 5083E limited VS. Kubota M8540
Foreman, sorry I wasted your time........but we love to argue politely around here.
Here's my latest Kabooty bash, "Them thar Kaboodys wouldn't pull a buttered string out of a hog's ar$e."
Folks, fuel usage is pretty much a wash between competitive makes nowadays.
Buy whatever blows your skirt up.
You can put a gold saddle on a donkey but it's still a donkey.
-
07-31-2011, 11:20 PM #80
Re: Deere 5083E limited VS. Kubota M8540
No time wasted here,didnt bother looking

Were still cool,when that deere gets in a bind you can always call on my BOTA to help a fella texan out
Similar Threads
-
Buying Advice Kubota compared to John Deere
By rarvesen in forum Kubota Buying/PricingReplies: 131Last Post: 06-10-2011, 09:43 PM -
Buying Advice John Deere compared to Kubota
By rarvesen in forum John Deere Buying/PricingReplies: 95Last Post: 03-21-2011, 04:14 PM -
deere 2720 vs kubota 2630
By ipwanab in forum Kubota Owning/OperatingReplies: 19Last Post: 03-28-2010, 06:52 PM -
JD855 = YANMAR what?
By JD855 in forum Parts/RepairsReplies: 16Last Post: 01-13-2010, 01:18 AM -
John Deere Warranty
By Big8 in forum John Deere Buying/PricingReplies: 4Last Post: 04-18-2005, 07:00 AM



Reply With Quote

