Results 41 to 42 of 42
-
07-28-2012, 03:59 PM #41Gold Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 318
- Location
- West Granby CT
- Tractor
- JD 4105. 375 Backhoe. 2005 Polaris Ranger
Re: JD 3320 vs 4105
Totally agree. Did not for a few reasons. It is very costly and can be added later for same price. I did not go SSQA based on one of threads. Skid steer stuff is just too heavy and JD doesn't make CUT size yet. The forks were free and JDQA so I figured what I saved on forks I would go with a JDQA grapple if needed, more appropriate weight, and add hydraulics then.
Thanks
-
07-28-2012, 04:18 PM #42Super Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 5,915
- Location
- Industry, Maine
- Tractor
- New Holland TC40
Re: JD 3320 vs 4105
That works too. The forks will help in moving stumps and brush.
Looking forward to pics when your new baby gets home.“It is a great thing to know the season for speech and the season for silence” ― Seneca (4 BC - 65 AD)
Reply With QuoteSimilar Threads
-
Comparison 2005 John Deere 3320 versus a new 3320
By cobracnvt in forum John Deere Buying/PricingReplies: 6Last Post: 07-23-2012, 09:13 AM -
Price Check 4105
By bm3 in forum John Deere Buying/PricingReplies: 3Last Post: 03-03-2012, 05:16 AM -
What will a 4105 take?
By JD5000 in forum John Deere Owning/OperatingReplies: 1Last Post: 08-05-2011, 02:06 AM -
Buying Advice 4105 plastic
By kenmore99 in forum John Deere Buying/PricingReplies: 19Last Post: 06-11-2010, 01:47 AM -
New 4105
By gamble77 in forum John Deere Buying/PricingReplies: 14Last Post: 06-25-2009, 09:11 PM
