1800+ lbs.
Printable View
28 horse power four wheel drive. hydraulic system with a 7.1 gallon capacity and a 7.8 gpm valve flow.
It presently has a 60 inch bucket on front.I'Il probably get a 60 inch whatever I decide on but the 48 inch looks inviting, If Im more looking to just grab stuff. like logs.
Im still back ad forth about the bucket type or rake type.I can see benefits of both.The 'rake' one has a larger opening of the grapple so that is good for brush.Id think.
I have 1/4 inch hose to the front and would have to reduce down the hydraulics. i assume this might just make it slower to open and close.
??It seems like it comes with 1/2 inch lines. Even all the 'regular' lines on my tractor are 3/8....
I added 1 of these Thumb grapple 24" to my 60'' bucket. less weight on the front my 35 hp tractor
I used a bolt on grapple because I didn't want to give up the use of the bucket but still wanted to be able to lift fallen trees and large rocks. I consider the grapple to be one of the most useful additions made to the tractor.
What data are you looking at ,Murphy? I got that info from the owners manual. I've been moving everything from telephone poles to as much brush as the grapple will hold and everything in between and have has no problems lifting anything. It struggled a little on a big stump with roots and dirt but only because I couldn't get a good grip on it. I had to carry it really low. Aside of that, this is a 72", the OP is looking at a smaller grapple and you'll be hard pressed to find one much lighter than 512 lbs.
From the Kubota website "FRONT LOADER PACKAGE (1,865 LIFT CAPACITY AT PIVOT PIN)"
Just wondering , when the rate lifting capoacity is that with any bucket all? Mine weights aroud 450. and I figure it wouldnt be any difference with the grapple.The bucket would be off when I use the grapple.
I also like the thumb idea.its refreshed my mind now.
I might consider that.thanks for jogging my mind lol