|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
Super Star Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South Bend, Indiana (near)
Posts: 12,223
|
Everyone is a deputized moderator at TBN. When you see a thread that has adult content, dirty words, clean words that can be twisted into dirty words, spam, bad behavior, etc... or, just a post that may be in an incorrect forum, has gigantic pictures, bad links, etc... just push that red yield sign button and all the "official" moderators as well as the forum owners will get notified and take any actions that are needed.
As for closed threads, maybe the same discussion is going on in several threads. It is better for the members if we keep it all in one discussion, so we close it and leave a pointer. Some threads do get closed permanently. Why? Because a few individuals get a bee in their bonnet and won't let a point go. For some reason they think if they keep making their point over and over again they are somehow going to convince the other guy they wrong. At that point, the "official" moderators start getting bombarded by the TBN membership at large requesting that the thread be closed due to the actions of a few folks that can't agree to disagree without taking pot shots at each other. If we leave those threads open it is akin to leaving a box of matches and a can of gas on the doorstep of the pyromaniac half-way house. ![]() It seems to work well to close the thread and let someone start a new one that gets things going again on the topic. I can honestly say that I have received requests to re-open less than half a dozen threads in the four years I have been doing this. If any member thinks the discussion topic of a thread is not finished after a thread has been closed, they are free to start another thread on the same subject and pick up where it left off, minus the bologna that got it locked in the first place. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) | |
|
Super Star Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South Bend, Indiana (near)
Posts: 12,223
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
Super Member
|
Quote:
Quite frankly I don't know what you do with your time. All I wanted was to see one of those threads. Maybe I don't read those threads, I know that there are a lot of off topic threads that I don't read. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sykesville, MD
Posts: 493
|
There is nothing in my posting that is inflammatory. I called no one a name or any such nonsense. You have no basis for closing this thread. The implication is clear: Jerry doesn't believe me, and apparently you don't either. I must be imagining what happened.
MossRoad, It's as if you know how I feel. Well, you don't. I am genuinely offended by Jerry's implication. You want to take action because I was offended and I let the poster know so, have had it. You want to ignore or dismiss the fact that closed threads have left me "wanting", that is also at the descretion of this website and it's moderators. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) | ||||
|
Super Star Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South Bend, Indiana (near)
Posts: 12,223
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sykesville, MD
Posts: 493
|
I said:
Quote:
I will now be hesitant to voice my real opinion for fear that your values of what is acceptable will restrict my post....Either way, the effect is the same; you get your censorship. Your descriptions of the neighbors thread (one of which may be the one that was closed on me) is exactly what I'm talking about. When posts are completely deleted, the thread starts to make no sense. Then it's closed "for no apparent reason" because readers are not informed. And to delete posts is blatant censorship. Strip out profanity, name-calling - OK. But outright deletion - NO. The moderators are deciding what I should or should not read. I would much prefer to make my own choices. Even if someone suggests I go shoot my neighbor, or calls me a liar outright, or any other name. Also, just because one starts a thread one somehow thinks they have a right to have it closed. I don't agree. As soon as another individual responds, the thread belongs to the forum, not the original poster. Quote:
It's clear we just don't agree here. The site is perfect. No changes are needed. All users are satisfied. Information is purely qualified. And the moderators are gods. So, I think enough has been said. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) | ||
|
Super Star Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South Bend, Indiana (near)
Posts: 12,223
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sykesville, MD
Posts: 493
|
OK, I see that. I couldn't see that since I don't know how long CBN as been around nor how long rural living has been on CBN as opposed to some othe place. I thought it was in rural living. It definitely was in the last year, and wasn't on countrybynet, I don't think. As I said, it was one of the neighbors threads you mentioned. It doens't really matter which threads. That's Nit-picky and distracts from the point (Oops, maybe this opinion is too harsh).
What matters is whether you recognize that the current approach to closing and filtering threads needs improvement. It's clear you want to hear it. |
|
|
|
![]() |
||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| About TractorByNet.com | Terms of Service | Advertise | © 2008 TractorByNet.com |