wihakowiSteve
Bronze Member
Weedwacker - string vs nylon \"blades\"?
I need some advice regarding the best way to doing heavier duty trimming with my weedwackers. I have always used the three "free spinning" nylon head apparatus on my Stihl for heavier trimming and it has worked OK for me. That is what I originally intended to get for my 21cc Echo trimmer but got talked into the type of head that you insert pre-cut lengths of string into. It will take up to .150 string which seems pretty heavy duty and I would think would last langer than the .095 that I run in the regular wind-up head. Here's my questions:
Is pre-cutting (8") the lengths of string and continually inserting them into the unit (although it is an easier process than some I have seen where you have to literally thread the length thorugh the head) going to turn into an exercise in frustration?
Doesn't the trimmer lose effeciency as the string gets shorter? Both in width of cut and ability to cut well (tip speed or something)?
Am I going to have enough power to drive a .150 string with the little Echo (21cc - I think their 2nd smallest model)? If I have to drop to a .095 string in the thing, I'll continue to use the tap-n-feed head.
Is a "free spinning" blade type head a better choice all around??
All help appreciated. Thanks, Steve
I need some advice regarding the best way to doing heavier duty trimming with my weedwackers. I have always used the three "free spinning" nylon head apparatus on my Stihl for heavier trimming and it has worked OK for me. That is what I originally intended to get for my 21cc Echo trimmer but got talked into the type of head that you insert pre-cut lengths of string into. It will take up to .150 string which seems pretty heavy duty and I would think would last langer than the .095 that I run in the regular wind-up head. Here's my questions:
Is pre-cutting (8") the lengths of string and continually inserting them into the unit (although it is an easier process than some I have seen where you have to literally thread the length thorugh the head) going to turn into an exercise in frustration?
Doesn't the trimmer lose effeciency as the string gets shorter? Both in width of cut and ability to cut well (tip speed or something)?
Am I going to have enough power to drive a .150 string with the little Echo (21cc - I think their 2nd smallest model)? If I have to drop to a .095 string in the thing, I'll continue to use the tap-n-feed head.
Is a "free spinning" blade type head a better choice all around??
All help appreciated. Thanks, Steve