Husqvarna's line of XP saws are excellent choices for the average firewood gathering even though they are pro saws. The smaller ones (338xpt & 346xpNE) are a bit more affordable of course, but all are worth the extra bucks IMO. The difference in the 346 and all of the other small Husky's is that it uses a magnesium case, most of the other small husky's use a plastic case (with the exception of the 353 and the 351 which both have the mag cases too), it also has a much more desireable Piston & Cylinder set-up, just look at the difference in the transfers. The 346 is not based on the 372 frame, two totally different animals; the 362xp shares the same case as the 372 (the new ones that is, the old ones use the small bar mount). The 346 does have the "Fat transfers" like the 372, just on a much smaller frame. the 346xpNE is a great saw, but the old 346xp's should not be frowned upon; they are very quick revving saws too, just about .3hp less. The older 346's (stock) will rev 14,500 with no problems at all, not 13,500 as stated. I have built a 346xpNE from an old model 346xp that I replaced the P&C on that is a pleasure to operate, but I'm sure not going to throw away my other 346xpOE. I would love to have a 262xp, as it was probably the best power to weight ratio saw ever made, the closest thing to it in the husky line up today is the 357xp (yep got one of those too!), but it's down on power to the 262 by .2hp. I have run the 385's and they are great runners too, just can't justify one right now as I have 2 of the 372's and an 056 Super AV Stihl that is still going strong. I cut on average 10-12 cords of wood per year for my use and also help others when needed, if I had to choose just two saws to keep it wouild be a 372XP and a 346XPNE!