Using proportional valves is a mixed bag. Yes, the valves themselves are expensive. Yes, proper "industrial" joysticks are not cheap either. But, if you have these components as a given, the layout of the hydraulic system can be done very differently than with the open center controls.
Open center controls bacically run all of the circuits in series. Since the controls are in a confined space (near the operator) this means lots of hoses running in every direction from the controls. Using proportional control, you would run a supply and return the length of the machine. So for example, one supply and one return to the loader and in the opposite direction to the hoe. Now each seperate circuit taps into the supply and return but with the valves mounted in situ (valve for loader arm on loader arm, valve for bucket tilt on quick attach plate, valve for hoe boom on boom and valve for dipper on dipper valve for curl possibly on dipper to keep it out of the worst dirt). This makes for a pretty clean layout and can save a bundle on hoses.
The key difference is that proportional systems will typically operate at "system pressure" which trends to draw a constant load, whether you are using the system or not. It is possible to utilize a seperate pressure regulator which is "load sensing" and which reduces system operating pressure when no load is detected, but it is pretty certain that this type of system wastes more energy than the simple open center system used in less expensive equipment. Heavy machinery that will have proportional control almost always has to work hard to earn its keep anyway, so commercial operators will generally have other things to worry about if their equipment is idle or "loafing".