HOME  DISCUSSIONS  PHOTOS  REVIEWS  CLASSIFIEDS  DEALERS  STORE
 

Go Back   TractorByNet.com > John Deere > John Deere Buying/Pricing
Show Recent Threads:
24 Hours
Since My Last Visit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-05-2009, 11:53 AM   #11 (permalink)
Super Member
 
kennyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 6,004
Default Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by froggy View Post
Unless I'm mistaken, the 4105 does not have any installed rear SCV's. This may or may not be an issue for future uses.
That's why I said above:
Quote:
First, you can add a extra remote to that machine, probably not with JD parts/kits, but it IS certainly possible.
There is a PB kit available, and with that you can add as many remotes as you want.
__________________
JD 4110HST
FEL, 60" MMM, 60" Rear Blade, Ballast Box, I-Match, #380 Snow Plow, FEL Forks, Goossen 3PH Chipper/Shredder, Markham LD-48 Grapple and much more "stuff"

JD 4x2 Turf Gator

Some of my projects/adventures are posted in my Picassa Web album.
kennyd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 09:57 AM   #12 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Central SC
Posts: 15
Default Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions?

My biggest reason not to consider the 4105 over the 4120 is that the 4105 does not have a foldable ROPS. By the time you figure in building a whole new equipment storage building with a 9-10' high door, you have more than paid for the 4120 with foldable ROPS.

Otherwise, the 4105 will do everything "I" need it to for less money than the 4120. FEL, and any rear mounted 3ph implement that I intend on using.

Rod
lizardman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 11:09 AM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 45
Default Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions?

Can't thank everyone enough for all the information/etc.

I really only want to buy one tractor and have it for the next 20 years. The 1948 John Deer model M isn't cutting it anymore..lolo

It's really going to strap me financially, but I'm starting to feel like the extra money would be well spent on the 4120?

~S
USMC2531 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 11:42 AM   #14 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: wyoming
Posts: 62
Default Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyd View Post
The Markham grapple I reference earlier weighs in at about 400lbs, not that much more than the bucket. There are PLENTY of people using them successfully on even smaller machines than the 4105.

The OP can buy a lot of implements with the 4K he would save.
I am sure there are, I was simply showing that with the added weight not to rely to much on printed specs. There is approx 700# capacity difference between loaders the hd 73" bucket weighs 280#'s (std bucket nla). If OP is just looking to do twigs, etc then it is fine. Beyond that if they can swing it a turbocharged Deere engine vs a turbo Yanmar engine along with other things like planetary drives etc these are just 2 VERY diff tractors.

Last edited by ctlguy; 07-06-2009 at 11:51 AM. Reason: turbo mistake
ctlguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 07:29 PM   #15 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 648
Default Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions?

I think you will be very happy with a 4120. That was the first new tractor we had on this farm (4 years ago) since the JD M my grandad bought back in 1950. the 4120 has not given me any trouble yet, and I expect it to still be going strong after 60 years just like the old M.
wolc123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 02:52 AM   #16 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
Uncle Wayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Moulton, Alabama (Lawrence County in the NW part of the state)
Posts: 65
Default Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jenkinsph View Post
I agree with bpsooner's above post, get the 4120 or larger tractor and buy the add on implements over time. In the long run you will be much happier with the 4x20 series.



Steve
That's what I done and have been glad I did. I started out looking at the 3038e, moved up to the 4105 and settled on the 4320. The price difference between the 4105 and the 4320 was only $1500 at my dealer.

I have not regretted the extra horsepower.
__________________
Wayne


"Maybe we should go back, And steal one more summer,
We are getting older now I would hate to think it might somehow slip away" - G.S. Harper
Uncle Wayne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 08:22 AM   #17 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 198
Default Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by USMC2531 View Post
Can't thank everyone enough for all the information/etc.

I really only want to buy one tractor and have it for the next 20 years. The 1948 John Deer model M isn't cutting it anymore..lolo

It's really going to strap me financially, but I'm starting to feel like the extra money would be well spent on the 4120?

~S
All the more reason to find a good used 4120. If you need the finnancing to make it happen it would still be cheaper to pay a bank a few % vs. buying a new unit with all those implements. Get a basic used package to get you started and add what extras you need over time.
whitedogone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 12:51 PM   #18 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Central Mississippi
Posts: 66
Default Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions?

I recently traded my 3320 for a 4320. The 4320 has about 5 more hp than the 4120 and 15 more HP than the 3320. While I liked the 3320 (33/25hp, same FEL as the 4105), the 4320 is a whole different animal. There is no replacement for extra HP. Also, the few comforts on the xx20 series are worth it in my opinion.
trook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 02:45 PM   #19 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5
Default Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions?

I RECENTLY PURCHASED A 4105 AND NOTICED THAT IT DOES NOT HAVE A REAR SCV. IS IT POSSIBLE TO INSTALL A REAR SCV ON THIS MODEL.
STRATOS268 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2009, 06:08 PM   #20 (permalink)
Super Member
 
kennyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 6,004
Default Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by STRATOS268 View Post
I RECENTLY PURCHASED A 4105 AND NOTICED THAT IT DOES NOT HAVE A REAR SCV. IS IT POSSIBLE TO INSTALL A REAR SCV ON THIS MODEL.
Welcome to TBN

First, please stop typing in all caps, it makes it very hard to read and is considered YELLING

I do not believe JD offers a 3rd SCV for this machine (maybe they will in the future), but they do have the Power Beyond kit for the backhoe option, and with that you could add your own valve.
__________________
JD 4110HST
FEL, 60" MMM, 60" Rear Blade, Ballast Box, I-Match, #380 Snow Plow, FEL Forks, Goossen 3PH Chipper/Shredder, Markham LD-48 Grapple and much more "stuff"

JD 4x2 Turf Gator

Some of my projects/adventures are posted in my Picassa Web album.
kennyd is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 PM.


HOME DISCUSSIONS PHOTOS REVIEWS CLASSIFIEDS DEALERS STORE
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertise | © 2009 TractorByNet.com
 

Safety Warning: TractorByNet.com does not review discussion forum posts for accuracy or safety. Please refer to manufacturer operator and safety manuals before operating tractors or equipment. Additionally, use caution and common sense when applying any advice you receive on TractorByNet.com, and seek professional advice before attempting professional tasks.
Page generated in 0.27986 seconds with 8 queries