07-03-2009, 05:55 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 45
| 4105 vs 4120 opinions? Hello,
Brand new here and lots of great information !
I am looking into buying a new tractor and initially I was sold on a 4105 because of the size & hp for the price.
My intent was to put a 60" Frontier grapple bucket on it, but I guess after speaking with the dealer there is no way to upgrade this tractor with the extra hydrolic line to operate the grapple bucket. Needless to say I was very disappointed. I have NUMEROUS usages for a grapple bucklet, but I'm not sure if I really want to take that 4k leap forward to a 4120 just so I can have a grapple? Starts to get a little pricy..........
Any thoughts, information, opinions would be great.
Thanks,
Steve |
| |
07-03-2009, 09:55 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 6,004
| Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions? Welcome to TBN Steve
First, you can add a extra remote to that machine, probably not with JD parts/kits, but it IS certainly possible. There are a couple way, including running long hoses from a factory installed rear remote(called a 3rd SCV by JD), or add one of two types of electric solenoid valves that can be operated from a switch of the joystick. The price to add a remote to your FEL will be anywhere from $150 to $700 or so...
Also, I would suggest you look at Markham Welding's grapples, they will be more than half the price of a Frontier bucket-my 48" was delivered for just under $1000.
Take time and do some searching on these terms for HOURS of reading on this very subject:
Markham
diverter
3rd function
WR Long
grapple
__________________ JD 4110HST
FEL, 60" MMM, 60" Rear Blade, Ballast Box, I-Match, #380 Snow Plow, FEL Forks, Goossen 3PH Chipper/Shredder, Markham LD-48 Grapple and much more "stuff"
JD 4x2 Turf Gator
Some of my projects/adventures are posted in my Picassa Web album. |
| |
07-03-2009, 11:23 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 45
| Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions? Hello,
Many thanks for taking the time to reply ! I really appreciate all the information you provided me with.
Would you have any pro's or con's of a 4105 ? Or anything I should now about? I plan on getting one with the 300cx loader, 375 back hoe, MX5, and a 655tiller? As much as I would like a 4120 I just can't swing it or I could buy the 4120, but with no attachments lolol
Thanks,
steve Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyd Welcome to TBN Steve
First, you can add a extra remote to that machine, probably not with JD parts/kits, but it IS certainly possible. There are a couple way, including running long hoses from a factory installed rear remote(called a 3rd SCV by JD), or add one of two types of electric solenoid valves that can be operated from a switch of the joystick. The price to add a remote to your FEL will be anywhere from $150 to $700 or so...
Also, I would suggest you look at Markham Welding's grapples, they will be more than half the price of a Frontier bucket-my 48" was delivered for just under $1000.
Take time and do some searching on these terms for HOURS of reading on this very subject:
Markham
diverter
3rd function
WR Long
grapple | |
| |
07-04-2009, 06:01 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 6,004
| Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions? I can't comment on the tractor, I just know a little about the hydraulics and how too hook everything up.
__________________ JD 4110HST
FEL, 60" MMM, 60" Rear Blade, Ballast Box, I-Match, #380 Snow Plow, FEL Forks, Goossen 3PH Chipper/Shredder, Markham LD-48 Grapple and much more "stuff"
JD 4x2 Turf Gator
Some of my projects/adventures are posted in my Picassa Web album. |
| |
07-04-2009, 12:16 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Bronze Member
Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: wyoming
Posts: 62
| Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions? The 300cx loader is capable of 3rd function hydraulics it is the tractor that is lacking with multiple functions. This could be handled with the use of a diverter valve (electical would be handiest) so that you push a switch or button to toggle from dump function to grapple function. The other downside would be the additional weight of the bucket attatchment with a grapple on the 4105 wich does not have near the hyd capacity that the 4000 20 series tractors do (12 gpm approx on 20 series) nor the higher end lifting capacity of the 400 series loaders. |
| |
07-05-2009, 08:45 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 45
| Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions? Good stuff I appreciate you taking the time to reply.
Any more pro's or con's of the 4105 wouldbe welcome.
~S Quote:
Originally Posted by ctlguy The 300cx loader is capable of 3rd function hydraulics it is the tractor that is lacking with multiple functions. This could be handled with the use of a diverter valve (electical would be handiest) so that you push a switch or button to toggle from dump function to grapple function. The other downside would be the additional weight of the bucket attatchment with a grapple on the 4105 wich does not have near the hyd capacity that the 4000 20 series tractors do (12 gpm approx on 20 series) nor the higher end lifting capacity of the 400 series loaders. | |
| |
07-05-2009, 09:43 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Bronze Member
Join Date: May 2009 Location: Purcell, Oklahoma
Posts: 78
| Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions? When I was looking for a tractor, I had the same types of questions that you have. Some advice was given to me that really helped me make my decision. Purchase a tractor based on your current needs and possible future needs.
If you are needing a grapple bucket and have projects that require it, I would get a tractor that can handle it. You do not want a year from now needing that larger tractor and having to look for another one. You do not want to regret your purchase.
If you can possibly afford it I would recommend purchasing the 4120. Having too much tractor is always better than not having enough...
__________________ Kubota M5040 with FEL
WOODS 6ft Brushbull Rotary Cutter
JD X320 Lawn Tractor
Polaris Sportsman 400 4x4 Jesus said to him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
John 14:6 |
| |
07-05-2009, 09:52 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Ruidoso, New Mexico
Posts: 1,064
| Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions? I agree with bpsooner's above post, get the 4120 or larger tractor and buy the add on implements over time. In the long run you will be much happier with the 4x20 series.
Steve |
| |
07-05-2009, 10:06 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 6,004
| Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions? Quote:
Originally Posted by ctlguy The other downside would be the additional weight of the bucket attatchment with a grapple on the 4105 wich does not have near the hyd capacity that the 4000 20 series tractors do (12 gpm approx on 20 series) nor the higher end lifting capacity of the 400 series loaders. | The Markham grapple I reference earlier weighs in at about 400lbs, not that much more than the bucket. There are PLENTY of people using them successfully on even smaller machines than the 4105.
The OP can buy a lot of implements with the 4K he would save.
__________________ JD 4110HST
FEL, 60" MMM, 60" Rear Blade, Ballast Box, I-Match, #380 Snow Plow, FEL Forks, Goossen 3PH Chipper/Shredder, Markham LD-48 Grapple and much more "stuff"
JD 4x2 Turf Gator
Some of my projects/adventures are posted in my Picassa Web album. |
| |
07-05-2009, 10:57 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Cooke County, Texas
Posts: 1,058
| Re: 4105 vs 4120 opinions? Unless I'm mistaken, the 4105 does not have any installed rear SCV's. This may or may not be an issue for future uses. |
| | | |