10-19-2009, 10:26 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | New Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
| X300 or x320 Is there anyone who feels the x320 is worth the extra $$ and why do you feel this way? |
| |
10-19-2009, 11:32 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Silver Member
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Utah
Posts: 194
| Re: X300 or x320 It all depends on what your needs are. The X300 and X320 share the same frame and controls, but the engine (17 to 22), transmission (K46 to K58) and mower deck (42" to 48") are all larger on the X320. How much area are you mowing? Do you have hills? Lots of obstacles to mow around? Will you be pulling a heavy cart on a consistent basis, or using the tractor for snow removal?
__________________ John Deere LX178 Lawn Tractor w/Mower, Snowblower & Plow - I know it is not a CUT, but I only have 1/2 acre! |
| |
10-19-2009, 11:46 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Bronze Member
Join Date: May 2009 Location: Purcell, Oklahoma
Posts: 78
| Re: X300 or x320 I have owned a X320 for a couple of years and it is an excellent mower. The large deck and more HP was the selling point to me. I guess it depends on how much mowing you have to do. I have over 1 ac to mow and the larger deck was able to cut down on the amount of time it took me. I had a 42in deck on my previous mower and the larger deck sure is a help. The X320 is a good mower.
__________________ Kubota M5040 with FEL
WOODS 6ft Brushbull Rotary Cutter
JD X320 Lawn Tractor
Polaris Sportsman 400 4x4 Jesus said to him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.
John 14:6 |
| |
10-19-2009, 12:01 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | New Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
| Re: X300 or x320 Quote:
Originally Posted by BleedGreen It all depends on what your needs are. The X300 and X320 share the same frame and controls, but the engine (17 to 22), transmission (K46 to K58) and mower deck (42" to 48") are all larger on the X320. How much area are you mowing? Do you have hills? Lots of obstacles to mow around? Will you be pulling a heavy cart on a consistent basis, or using the tractor for snow removal? | Should have said in OP I'm replacing LT 180 I only use a 38" deck because of (gate openings) I will be using the snowblower attachment. I have read where the K58 is also non serviceable. So i guess I'm saying is it worth the upgrade from X300 for tranny that most say is not much better, as far as HP my LT had 17hp and never bogged down! |
| |
10-19-2009, 12:44 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Bronze Member
Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Maine
Posts: 55
| Re: X300 or x320 We've owned an X320 for a few years now. Never have regretted getting the 320 over the 300. The extra power will be handy for the snowblower as well.
__________________ Deere 4120 eHydro, 445 Hydro, 2210 Hydro, 320X Hydro, Kawasaki 3010 Mule. Lots of implements. I'm pretty sure this Deere addiction is a sickness! |
| |
10-20-2009, 10:03 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: western NC
Posts: 1,602
| Re: X300 or x320 I bought my parents an X360. Now that is the way to go. The only complaint I have about it is the tires are not large in circumference and over rutted terrain can result in the floating mower scalping some, but this is only over terrain one really needs a compact or subcompact to handle. As for stoutness, the 320 or 360 are powered essentially the same and do a great job for mowing. The Kawasaki engines really suck down the fuel, though. I have had 7-8 mowers with them, and my truck gets better fuel economy.
John M |
| |
10-20-2009, 09:49 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | New Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17
| Re: X300 or x320 my input:
I just got the 304 literally 5 days ago after years of research(or procrastination on my part) It has the kawisacki 17 hp. I am telling you that the 17 kawi like my 23 year old j.d.180 with a kawi is awesome. My property is all hills and obstacles. I chose the 304 for the 4 wheel steer too, and i am not disappointed, at all.
The machine is solid, and what a great cut too. I looked at the other x series models but the 304 at 3200 just made too much sense. |
| |
10-20-2009, 09:53 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | New Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17
| Re: X300 or x320 that i have to agree with, they do like to slurp the petrol. That said, the kawi's are awesome machines. I have a 1980 J.D. 180 with a single cylinder kawi that still runs like new. Cant wait to see how my new twin cylinder is going to last |
| |
10-20-2009, 11:00 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | New Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
| Re: X300 or x320 Quote:
Originally Posted by backwoodsmanone my input:
I just got the 304 literally 5 days ago after years of research(or procrastination on my part) It has the kawisacki 17 hp. I am telling you that the 17 kawi like my 23 year old j.d.180 with a kawi is awesome. My property is all hills and obstacles. I chose the 304 for the 4 wheel steer too, and i am not disappointed, at all.
The machine is solid, and what a great cut too. I looked at the other x series models but the 304 at 3200 just made too much sense. | X304 won't work for me as I need a 38" deck to get through gates, thinking hard about X320 for better tranny. Enjoy your new tractor! Good luck and have a nice day. |
| |
10-31-2009, 11:00 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | New Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
| Re: X300 or x320 Quote:
Originally Posted by Buz-ccc X304 won't work for me as I need a 38" deck to get through gates, thinking hard about X320 for better tranny. Enjoy your new tractor! Good luck and have a nice day. | Ordered X320 W/38" deck and Snow Blower |
| | | |