02-22-2012, 05:15 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Silver Member
Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Grimes County, Texas
Posts: 166
|  3320 vs 3520 JD. Turbo or not
Any issues with turbos on the 3520?
I always want more power whether I use it or not. I will have to order the 3520 and the 3320 is in stock. I want the 300cx loader , 2 remotes, vertical stack, top & tilt.
These are 2012
I could save $1000 on a 3320 built June of 2010 new old stock, but it is weather worn.
Just looking for some feed back.... | 
|  | |
02-22-2012, 05:20 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Eastern CT
Posts: 1,302
| Re: 3320 vs 3520 JD. Turbo or not
For pto work get the 3520 otherwise stick with the 3320. You'll run out of traction before hp. And they're identical in every other dept. I've been very impressed with mine.
Matt
__________________ 3320 TLB , Woods box blade , , JD snow plow, 2500hd Dmax crew , PJ dump trailer , Belmont 12k tilt bed trailer, Millonzi grapple, Woods Harley rake, Horst Forks, 5' Woods Brush Bull X, Woods PHD35 9" auger, Frontier 60" 4in1 bucket, custom 60" rock bucket, BearCat chipper/shredder  | 
| | |
02-22-2012, 05:29 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Silver Member
Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Grimes County, Texas
Posts: 166
| Re: 3320 vs 3520 JD. Turbo or not
Forgot to mention...665 JD tiller.
What about the power reverser?
I like it, but for others (family members) I think the HST is idiot proof.
Resale is better on the HST from what I have seen. | |
| | |
02-22-2012, 09:26 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Platinum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 567
| Re: 3320 vs 3520 JD. Turbo or not
the ONLY reason i went with the 3520 is for the extra power mowing with 72 inch mid mount mower with A/c running in the cab. I have read about performance issues with a/c running and higher grass. IF not for the cab, i woulda went with the 3320 hands down because i wont be running many rear attachments
__________________
2005 and 2008 Border Collies (My two best friends)
2012 John Deere Deluxe Cab 3520 (Arrival Feb 28, 2012) | |
| | |
02-22-2012, 09:36 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Flint, Michigan
Posts: 2,291
| Re: 3320 vs 3520 JD. Turbo or not
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wnc3  Forgot to mention...665 JD tiller.
What about the power reverser?
I like it, but for others (family members) I think the HST is idiot proof.
Resale is better on the HST from what I have seen. | HST is a must for any CUT. Won't regret it. I have the PowerReverser on the 5410 and HST on the 3120 and they are both better at their respective jobs. A CUT needs to get close to things, hence the HST, a Utility needs power, hence the PowerReverser.
__________________
2005 Deere 110 TLB - 3rd function loader, 3 rear remotes, thumb, top n tilt
2000 Deere 5410 - 541 SL loader, 2 rear remotes, canopy
2005 Deere Diesel HPX Gator - homemade cab, snow plow, hydraulic dump
1953 Farmall Cub - front plow
2006 GMC 4500 Topkick Pickup outfitted by Monroe Truck
Everyone has a fair turn to be as great as he pleases
Jeremy Collier | |
| | |
02-23-2012, 02:43 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Elite Member
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Kasilof, Alaska
Posts: 4,214
| Re: 3320 vs 3520 JD. Turbo or not
Get the HST. If you're planning to do alot of finish mowing and that typically involves obstacles and close-in work: you'll be Soooo happy you went with the HST.
And yes, the resale or trade-in is much better! 
AKfish
__________________
"Most people want to live on top of the mountain, but all the happiness and growth occurs while you're climbing it." | |
| | |
02-23-2012, 09:02 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Silver Member
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: SW OH-Go Bucks
Posts: 124
|
If you plan on doing much loader work, you won't regret getting HST. It's so much easier to use and allows you to do more work in less time.
__________________
JD 3320 JD 2040 Ford 8N | |
| | |
02-23-2012, 10:54 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Silver Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 180
| Re: 3320 vs 3520 JD. Turbo or not
I love my 3520. I have the PR, and while I agree with the others about the HST, don't think you can't inch into a pile or truck with the PR. I have absolutely no issues loading vehicles with mine which requires me to get really close. It does take some practice, but the PR is a nice transmission. Again though, agree with the others that the HST just makes it really simple.
BTW, I have the 665 tiller and it is a very nice tiller and have zero issues running it with the 3520. | |
| | |
02-26-2012, 01:03 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Elite Member
Advertiser
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: 4000\' mountains of Southern California
Posts: 4,887
| Re: 3320 vs 3520 JD. Turbo or not
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wnc3 Any issues with turbos on the 3520?
I always want more power whether I use it or not. I will have to order the 3520 and the 3320 is in stock. I want the 300cx loader , 2 remotes, vertical stack, top & tilt.
These are 2012
I could save $1000 on a 3320 built June of 2010 new old stock, but it is weather worn.
Just looking for some feed back.... | The turbo will usually give you a better torque curve and that alone will make the tractor nicer to operate. I'm sure that the non turbo is fine, but IMO the turbo machine would be nicer to have. But it all costs $$$$ and with the $$$$ saved with the 3320 you could buy your "TnT" kit and have $$$ left over.
Complete "TnT" kit, 2 1/2" dia cylinders, hose kits, QD ends and flow restrictors, all for $585 + shipping costs.  | |
| | |
02-26-2012, 02:14 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Bronze Member
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Skamania County
Posts: 55
| Re: 3320 vs 3520 JD. Turbo or not
I passed on the 3520 b/c I didn't (and still don't) need more PTO power than the 3320 offers. Ended up with HST even though I wanted the PR b/c an HST model was on the lot and the dealer gave me a deal. Glad since then that I got the HST. I also run out of traction before HP, but the only PTO I use is a rear mount snowblower. | |
| | | |
Similar Threads 
Linear Mode
