meburdick
Platinum Member
If you go with the 3320 and unload the rear tires, remove fel or front weights the turf tires should do an okay job without much damage. I would figure out a way to keep the 345 to use instead imo. Nothing wrong with buying a larger tractor if you want it.
If you unload the rears, take off the BB, and don't have (or run without) an FEL, you're definitely minimizing impact that way (especially with Turfs). But, if you buy a 3320 with no FEL or BB and unload the rears, you're losing all of its ability to "be" a tractor.
In my opinion, if you're unloading (or not loading - used versus new) the rears of a 3320 because you want minimize its impact on the ground, then you're using too big of a machine to do what you need. Either scale down, or get a second machine that's much smaller to do the lighter work.
Basically, if you are spending more time manuvering than straight out mowing, its going to look bad.
And sure, the tractor is a good bit heavier than a conventional mower, but keep in mind that the added weight is also spread out over much larger tires too. The the imprint might not be much worse than a regular old mower.
Very true on both points.
I went from a GT to a 2320 with R4's, and there was a huge difference in compaction.
Gotcha. I suspect that you would have seen a little less "negative" impact with R3s, but the R4s have less actual rubber on the ground at any given time compared to R3s. So, the pressure transferred to the ground would have a higher PSI with the R4s and would do a little more compacting.