Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
09-16-2003, 06:49 PM #1
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 3
- Location
- ME
woods 9000 versus JD 48 on JD 4710
I have pretty much decided to purchase a 4710 JD tractor. Well just as soon as I sell my 790. I want to purchase a backhoe at the same time. I am torn between the Woods 9000 vs the John deere 48. Can any one list the pro's and con's, or any other information regarding this decision. Basically the dealer I am dealing with Sells them both for the same price. only catch is I have to wait a month for a Woods. And he has 2 Deere 48's in stock. Would it be worth the wait or is the deere just as good of a unit. I have a Christmas tree farm and want to use the hoe to remove the old stumps before I replant my trees.
-
09-16-2003, 08:25 PM #2
Re: woods 9000 versus JD 48 on JD 4710
You would not go wrong with the deere. It's a great unit and the fact that there would be no "finger pointing" (should there ever be a service issue) and that it is in stock seem hard to beat.
-
09-16-2003, 09:45 PM #3Super Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2000
- Posts
- 5,811
- Location
- Northern CA.
- Tractor
- Push mower, Snapper 21" 6 shovels, 2 rakes, a pick, 2 pinch bars, a post hole digger (two handle type and 2 wheel barrows that handle like a Porsche.
Re: woods 9000 versus JD 48 on JD 4710
Wow, now thats an upgrade. After having a 790, your about to be blown away by the 4710. Personally, I would rather have the Woods 9000 over the JD48. Either will be suitable. Looking at the two side by side I think the engineering on the Woods is just a step up. What ever the case, you've got a nice setup.
-
09-16-2003, 10:46 PM #4Super Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2000
- Posts
- 6,737
- Tractor
- JD 8320 MFWD, JD 6415 MFWD, FEL, and cab, John Deere MFWD 4600, John Deere 4020, John Deere 4430, John Deere 455 mower, Deutz, and Gehl 4610 perkins skidsteer
Re: woods 9000 versus JD 48 on JD 4710
I mulled over this same decision a couple years ago. In my opinion there is no question the deere far and away blew away the woods. If you look at how they both attach, the fit, the steel, etc. I think you'll agree. The woods is made to fit a variety of models. The JD 48 is specifically made and engineered to fit the deere model and it shows when you go to hook up and use the unit. I have used mine to abuse and it has yet to fail one bit.
-
09-17-2003, 03:59 PM #5Super Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2000
- Posts
- 9,000
- Location
- Triangle Of North Carolina
- Tractor
- JD 4700
Re: woods 9000 versus JD 48 on JD 4710
mainetreeman,
I can't compare the Woods model but I do have a 48. Its easy to get on/off the tractor especiallly if you use the stabilizers.
I have dug up hundreds and hundreds of stumps. Maybe a
dozen or so that where 36+ inches. It took awhile but it
worked.
The only problem I have had with mine was a leaky hydraulic
fitting that I replaced and I broke a bolt that held the pin that
held the boom and dipper stick togather. I have used the 48
and it has done what I wanted it to do.
It was and is worth the money.
Hope this helps,
Dan McCarty
-
09-17-2003, 09:47 PM #6
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 84
- Location
- Rocky Hill CT.
- Tractor
- JD 790 Satoh Beaver
Re: woods 9000 versus JD 48 on JD 4710
I would presonaly look into Hardy I have done some home work and this is the one I perfer http://www.romanengine.com/tractorsns/hardy/index.htm
-
09-18-2003, 10:04 PM #7Veteran Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Posts
- 1,598
- Location
- Greene Co, Arkansas
- Tractor
- JD 1050 2wd, Case 580D 2wd
Re: woods 9000 versus JD 48 on JD 4710
They finally have a website up. GoHardy
Was looking at their log loaders for a future dream.


Reply With Quote
