Compact Utility Series

   / Compact Utility Series
  • Thread Starter
#11  
Mrwurm,

What type and size implements did you use with your old 650?

I'm wanting to pull a bushhog, box blade, and finishing mower.


Thanks Men for all the info,
DC
 
   / Compact Utility Series #12  
I ran a 60in mid mower. It had plenty of power for it.

I also ran a front dozer blade for snow removal.

Used a 6ft rake on the back to grade and level an acre or so. This implement really put a burdon on the engine. I had to run in low range to keep from overheating. I think 5ft implements should be the max.
 
   / Compact Utility Series #13  
Not necessarily, the 4xxx series all have Yanmar engines but are assembled in GA. Currently, only the 790 and 990 are completely built by Yanmar for Deere /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
   / Compact Utility Series #15  
" know the 790 and 990 are Yanmar built tractors so I assume the 770, 670 and 970 are as well, right?"

Not sure about the 970, but the 670 and 770 are Yanmar built machines. The 970 is a larger machine then the other two of the 70 series (so is the 870, BTW).

I haven't seen too many 770's around and it seems more of them (based upon searches on Machinefinder.com) are 2WD then 4WD. I know there is a handful of TBNer's that own them...just as there's only a relative few 670 owners frequenting TBN.

But, as said in my original post...these are really tough little tractors!
 
   / Compact Utility Series #16  
Oh yeah, I forgot about the 2210. Steve, are you saying the 2210 is a US assembled tractor with a Yanmar engine too? That would make sense as it shares quite a bit the the 4010 doesn't it?

/forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
   / Compact Utility Series #17  
Here are some specs for comparison. Some manufactures provide Gross HP figures at the flywheel, some net, some both:

The folllowing are JD Models: Gross HP, Net HP, PTO HP, # of cylinders, disp in cu. in., trans gears forward/reverse, weight for 4 wheel drive models. They all offered 4 wheel drive at one time:

670 19.3 18.5 16 3 53.6 8/2 1,860
755 21 20 15 3 53.6 Hydro 2 range 1,835
770 25.5 24 20 3 83.1 8/2 2,105
855 24.9 24 19 3 60.7 Hydro 2 range 1,870
870 28.7 28 25 3 87.3 9/3 2,760
955 35.3 33 27 3 87.3 Hydro 2 range 1,990
970 35 33 30 4 110.8 9/3 3,045
1070 40.9 38.5 35 4 116.3 9/3 3,265

Although the 55 series engines are putting out more HP per cu. in, they typically do it in the 3,200 rpm range vs 2,600 rpm range. for the 70 series. Those tractors are of a new design and are definately lighter in weight than the 70 (now 90 series)

I currently own a 770 4 X 4 and have been running a 4 ft LX4 rotary cutter. I've cut stuff higher than the stack with no problem and no bogging down. I probably could drive a 5' as the guy I bought this from did use a 5'. Mine is a 1998, the last year for a 770. They were replaced by the essentially the same 790, only with 5 more HP accross the board. Mine had 230 hours on it and I've added 25. It's a great, tough little "basic" tractor, built in Japan by Yanmar.

If you want me to, I can copy the brochure for the above models and mail it to you. Send me an E-mail. Sorry the numbers are jumbled up and hard to read, they were in neat columns when I posted it.

Hope this info helps. I was able to find a catalogue at the dealer, but I had to ask for it and they dug it out of their files.

Joe
 
   / Compact Utility Series #18  
<font color="red"> </font> are you saying the 2210 is a US assembled tractor with a Yanmar engine too? <font color="red"> </font>

Nope, I believe the 2210 comes over on the boat ready to go.
 
   / Compact Utility Series #19  
All of the 70 series were Japanese made by Yanmar. I agree that they are really tough machines. I am glad to see so many people like them because us 55/70/90 series owners need to stick together and fend off the 4000 series owners. They have their own club! /forums/images/graemlins/smirk.gif

Nick
990 4x4
 
   / Compact Utility Series #20  
My 4110 came over on the boat also... /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
 
 
Top