Weight, Hills and Balance

   / Weight, Hills and Balance #1  

TNTractor1

Silver Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2011
Messages
111
Location
Jackson, TN
Tractor
2011 JD2520
I just ordered my new 2520 with FEL and 62D MMM today. I have been searching and reading this forum all day to learn more about my tractor and I have found lots of good info so far. I need some advice on how to best equip my tractor to best handle the layout of my land. My land has some hilly areas with trees. I know that I need to use the ballast box with weight for loader work, but I am unsure about some weight issues... here are a few questions I have:
1. When mowing, is it best to detach the bucket, keep the bucket on and low, detach the whole loader and bucket, or does it matter?
2. Should I get the tires loaded since I have some hills? Is there a disadvantage to loading the tires?
3. Would weight in the ballast box help when mowing the hills?

Basically, I am trying to understand if loaded tires are right for me. Thanks in advance.
 
   / Weight, Hills and Balance #2  
I always take the FEL completely off my 2520 when I mow. It's just easier to maneuver and get close to things without it.

I don't have a ballast box, but the rear tires are filled. I've never had a problem with not having enough weight, although I often also have the 60" rear blade on when using the loader.

I'm sure the extra weight in the tires lowers the center of gravity and makes it more stable. I thought it may also cause the tractor to tear up the lawn more, or leave R4 tracks in the lawn, but that's never been a problem. I've not regretted having them filled.
 
   / Weight, Hills and Balance #3  
I feel your pain X2.

I have a 2520 and mow 20 degree side hills. I have both the 62D and a 72 inch rear finish mower, but primarily use the RFM because I feel it delivers a better cut and it's easier to trim under trees, etc.

My property is so hilly that I have to mow in 4WD all the time. The RFM is heavy and tries to pull the rear of the machine sideways on the hills. I'm not complaining, just giving you some background as to my situation.

Anyway, although I knew I'd need ballast weight, I chose not to load the tires and went with wheel weights (the maximum 3 per side). I also keep the loader on (without the bucket) and feel that the extra weight helps.

The upshot of it is, it works, but just barely. The machine still slides sideways on the hills and will still break traction fairly easily if I'm not real careful. I haven't run my 62D in awhile, but didn't notice a lot of difference, other than less of a tendency to pull sideways.

On the plus side, I can report that the machine has always felt stable in this environment, however, I never let my guard down. On the steepest areas, I take it very slowly and am always ready to take corrective action if it acts like it's going to tip.

I have never tried carrying the weight box when using the belly mower, but it would probably help traction. However, I wouldn't want to carry a lot of weight behind the rear axle and nothing on the front. If/when I try it, I would probably have my loader frame on or suitcase weights on the front rack to keep the front end from getting light.

Generally speaking, I'm kind of leery about using the ballast box as weight for traction on hills because I think a good portion of the weight may wind up above the axle line, which isn't the best for stability.

I can't answer your questions except to say what I would do and there are many people on here who are more knowledgeable than me.

1. I have tried mowing with/without the loader and (at least with the RFM) I prefer to keep the loader on and drop the bucket off (for maneuverability).
2. Loading the tires is probably a good idea, however, I personally chose not to do so because I did not want to deal with the issue of losing the liquid when/if I got tire punctures.
3. As mentioned, I haven't tried the ballast box when mowing, but have given it some thought and would probably try it, but not with full weight. The way I have mine set up, I can vary the weight from 400 to 800 or so lbs and I would probably try running with the minimum amount in the box at first.

I dont' know if any of this helps, but the message is that you may need to experiment a little to see what works for you.

Incidentally, the picture on the left is on the 20 degree side slope, although it doesn't look that steep.

Wishing you the best of luck.
 

Attachments

  • 100_0279.jpg
    100_0279.jpg
    899.8 KB · Views: 467
  • 100_0703 B.JPG
    100_0703 B.JPG
    785 KB · Views: 427
   / Weight, Hills and Balance
  • Thread Starter
#4  
When tires are "loaded", how much are they filled with fluid? Half full? Less, more? Seems like once you go over half full it wouldn't be as effective.
 
   / Weight, Hills and Balance #5  
When tires are "loaded", how much are they filled with fluid? Half full? Less, more? Seems like once you go over half full it wouldn't be as effective.

Usually 75% to allow air flex, or at least enough to cover the rim to help protect against corrosion.
 
   / Weight, Hills and Balance #6  
When tires are "loaded", how much are they filled with fluid? Half full? Less, more? Seems like once you go over half full it wouldn't be as effective.

I'm with you on this one. When I get my tires filled I am probably only going to fill them 50%. Hadn't thought about the over the rim to prevent corrosion, but I plan on using rimguard so maybe it won't make a diff. I think using the MMM would be better for your center of gravity. The MMM being suspended under the tractor would make a good low ballast on the tractor.
 
   / Weight, Hills and Balance #7  
Ever thought of a ballast box and a bucket of dirt on the loader?? why spend more money than you have too?

Wooden
 
   / Weight, Hills and Balance #8  
I always mow steep hills by backing straight up them, then drive down and repeat. Mowing on the side of a steep hill is risky at best, at worse your tractor will slide down the hill sideways. R1s are better than R4s for this, but backing up is ideal.
 
   / Weight, Hills and Balance #9  
Another reason 75% fill is recommended is to keep the slosh down and minimize the drag of the fluid in the tire. I have driven tractors with 50% fill and it can get sporting as the fluid sloshes back and forth.:)
 
   / Weight, Hills and Balance #10  
I have some hills that still scare me , only going up & down I have lost traction and have slid a few times . Using 4 wd is is must on these hills and have had to use the FEL to stop!!! Wet grass over clay not good! Also have a stream running down the back side of the hill running in to the pond.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2018 Cottrell AUTO CARRIER (A43005)
2018 Cottrell AUTO...
2025 JMR 72in Grapple Rake Tractor Attachment (A46683)
2025 JMR 72in...
24 Clearstream CS-103ED Septic Air Pump With Tanks (A45336)
24 Clearstream...
2016 FREIGHTLINER CASCADIA DAY CAB TRACTOR (A45677)
2016 FREIGHTLINER...
2016 Ver-Mac S/A Towable Trailer Message Board (A45336)
2016 Ver-Mac S/A...
2010 UTILITY 53X102 DRY VAN TRAILER (A45677)
2010 UTILITY...
 
Top