Results 1 to 10 of 14
-
11-14-2012, 12:19 AM #1Bronze Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Posts
- 54
- Location
- Nevada
- Tractor
- John Deere 955, mod 70 FEL, model 7 backhoe
955 ROPS too low
Does anyone else have a problem with the height of the ROPS on the 955? I have a model 7 backhoe and my head touches the ROPS while I'm using it. Gets uncomfortable ducking down. I'm thinking about adding about 4 inches to it to eliminate the problem. Has anyone done this?
-
11-14-2012, 12:47 AM #2
Re: 955 ROPS too low
There is (or was) an optional tall ROPS available for the x55 series for use with a backhoe. I fortune to have bought a 955 that had the tall ROPS on it already. Yes, the standard ROPS is way too short for comfortable use with the 7 backhoe. The tall ROPS provides plenty of headroom while seated on the 7 BH.
If you're handy with a welder, it would be pretty easy to add 4" to each upright, and section a piece out of the top bar of the ROPS.
-
11-14-2012, 01:03 AM #3
Re: 955 ROPS too low
Wow... amazingly, the tall ROPS is still available from deere for the low low price of $525. Part number AM119856
-
11-14-2012, 02:07 AM #4New Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 6
- Location
- Jeanerette, La.
- Tractor
- JD/955
Re: 955 ROPS too low
Anyone have a ROPS for a 955 they don't need, my tractor had it removed before I got it. I would like to find one, I think the sway limiters attach to it also.
-
11-14-2012, 06:58 AM #5Platinum Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 858
- Location
- Kansas
- Tractor
- John Deere 755 purchased new in 1993
Re: 955 ROPS too low
I remember back in the 1990's when the 55 series tractors were new. There were always plenty of standard roll bars stacked behind the local JD dealer that had been removed to install the optional taller one. I would imagine they were probably all eventually sold for scrap.
JD 755, 70 Loader, 60 inch MMM, Landpride rear blade, Modern box blade, Wallace subsoiler
-
11-14-2012, 09:38 AM #6Bronze Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Posts
- 54
- Location
- Nevada
- Tractor
- John Deere 955, mod 70 FEL, model 7 backhoe
I guess I'll just raise it. I'm thinking cut it on both sides, then weld a piece inside the existing box tube. Then i'll add the 4 inches. Slip the top section over the new inner box tube and weld it up. I'll prob grind the welds smooth so it should be undetectable that the raise was even done. Paint it that pretty green color and call it a day. That's the plan anyway.
-
11-14-2012, 10:49 AM #7Platinum Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Posts
- 605
-
11-14-2012, 11:13 AM #8Bronze Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
- Posts
- 54
- Location
- Nevada
- Tractor
- John Deere 955, mod 70 FEL, model 7 backhoe
I'm sure it won't meet factory spec but as a certified welder I feel I can get it as close as anyone can in my home "tinker shop". And my time is free to me, just like your opinion is to you.
Originally Posted by buickanddeere
-
11-14-2012, 11:41 AM #9
Re: 955 ROPS too low
How could you be told I was french?
4' Howse rotary cutter, mid mount lawnmower, f.e.loader, pallet forks, tiller, cultivator, middle buster, snowblower, grass-sweeper, quick hitch, trailer hitch, jodale-perry cab
-
12-24-2012, 06:24 PM #10New Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Posts
- 17
- Location
- Greenwich, NY
- Tractor
- John Deere 955
Re: 955 ROPS too low
Can anyone tell me what the height is on the tall one? I have one "off" my 955 because of a cozy cab. Plan on taking cab off and get a #7 backhoe. Would like to do any modifying needed before I bolt it back on... thanks! Bob
Similar Threads
-
Snow JD 955 snowblower rides too low
By Snowslider in forum John Deere Owning/OperatingReplies: 13Last Post: 03-10-2012, 08:11 PM -
Power for ROPS aux lights on a 955?
By onthehill in forum John Deere Owning/OperatingReplies: 0Last Post: 08-22-2011, 08:02 PM -
considering a used 955 with low hours
By ted5487 in forum John Deere Owning/OperatingReplies: 5Last Post: 11-08-2005, 10:37 PM -
Remembering to low the ROPS!
By Bob_Trevithick in forum John Deere Owning/OperatingReplies: 3Last Post: 12-30-2001, 08:26 AM


Reply With Quote

