|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Charlottesville, Va
Posts: 70
|
That might make sense. Another thought: I see the point with a front loader needing the weight...especially going downhill. However, suppose you do not have your FEL on and an implement on the rear going uphill? Now you need front weight or a reduction in the tire weight? Removable weight would seem to be better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lakeview,N.Y.(WNY)
Posts: 340
|
<font color=red>"the constant weight on the frame would cause axle bearings and other suspension parts to wear faster than they would if the weight was not on the axles (i.e., in the wheel or tire)."</font color=red>
Mark,they have some good points.I've heard that too much front weight on 2wd tractors will often bend and break front axles because the wheels cannot climb out of trouble easily. I don't know if this would apply to rear wheels but I did have a tractor with weighted rears and it had a tendency to throw the tractor(and me) around on uneven ground. I guess they all have pros/cons...........Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Western N.C. from New Orleans.
Posts: 280
|
Mike,,, Thanks but I can't take credit for anything but a little clicking of the mouse. I went HERE</font color=blue> and got the info.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| About TractorByNet.com | Terms of Service | Advertise | © 2008 TractorByNet.com |