In another thread, a person had stated that they wouldn't consider a Deere, or any tractor that didn't have the HST plus transmission -- that it is so superior, even a regular Kubota HST shouldn't be on my list of potential models.
I realize this thought is probably hyperbole to a degree. I know plenty of people are happy with their L4400, MX5100, Deere, etc. I've watched the Kubota videos.
My question is for those of you with experience with both. If you have had a tractor with a regular HST and also experience with the newer HST+, how much difference is there REALLY for routine (and admittedly what will be light/moderate usage.) Is it truly going to make my life so much better that that feature ALONE would be worth giving up 10 HP. (For example, the L3940 and MX5100) are similar priced, but 10 HP different, and the MX doesn't have the plus.)
I realize this thought is probably hyperbole to a degree. I know plenty of people are happy with their L4400, MX5100, Deere, etc. I've watched the Kubota videos.
My question is for those of you with experience with both. If you have had a tractor with a regular HST and also experience with the newer HST+, how much difference is there REALLY for routine (and admittedly what will be light/moderate usage.) Is it truly going to make my life so much better that that feature ALONE would be worth giving up 10 HP. (For example, the L3940 and MX5100) are similar priced, but 10 HP different, and the MX doesn't have the plus.)