namesray
Platinum Member
ok. i am sure this has been discussed simular to the SUDT debate, i have searched some here on tbn on this topic and actually found the wix filter site link here and did my homework and crossed referenced all my filter needs for my b7800 and rtv 900 and have the correct wix (napa) numbers.
the question is: IF it is cheaper to go with the napa (wix) filters, is it worth it? what makes the kubota filters different?
i know the sayings "pay now or pay later", "you get what you pay for", "i just about ruined my (thousands$$$) engine, but i saved $5 on my oil filter that didn't have the anti drain back or correct flow specs."
but if the manufacture of wix (napa) states this filter matches up correctly, why would kubota's filter be better? i have run only kubota filters/oils on the equipment up to current. 856 hours on b7800, and 589 on rtv 900 with no problems. common sence might suggest to stick with the kubota filters, but money is a little tight right now and maybe i was just throwing money away paying for higher priced kubota filters (i will stick with the sudt2 oil). i am a by the book minded person when it comes to pm on equipment. my equipment is highly maintained and the manuels state to "use only a genuine kubota filter to prevent serious damage" and that "to ensure long life of your kubota product, use only kubota genuine parts." how true is that or is it a sales pitch? i know if i went with oem replacement parts on my vehicles, i would spent a fortune more. (door handle for truck: dealer=$79, auto zone=$39 and this is just one instance) and i have been running napa and fram filters on my vehicles with pennzoil. i didn't put all these miles on myself, but 04 gmc truck has 219,000 miles on it, 96 gmc truck has 228,000 miles on it, and 05 jeep liberty has 82,000 miles on it. yes both trucks have reman engines in them, but still.
the golf course i worked on run kubota engines in just about all turf equipment we used, and we used napa filters and i saw those engines worked hard up to and over 2500 hours. even used non kubota udt hydrolic oil, but the most equipment was jacobsen, not kubota, just kubota engines.
so for all the mechanics, experts, and people with experience, what do you all think? i will be keeping my equipment for as long as possible, and it is used in a business/commercial setting and gets the hours put on. last year b7800= 300+ hours, rtv 900= 200+ hours and the hours will atleast be just as high each year. the dealer is no further away then the local napa store, so price difference is the only deciding factor. but if someone out there knows if, how, and why kubota filters are better, then that will negate the price difference for me.
i greatly will appreciate any and all info. never too much information for me. thanks to everyone in advance!
the question is: IF it is cheaper to go with the napa (wix) filters, is it worth it? what makes the kubota filters different?
i know the sayings "pay now or pay later", "you get what you pay for", "i just about ruined my (thousands$$$) engine, but i saved $5 on my oil filter that didn't have the anti drain back or correct flow specs."
but if the manufacture of wix (napa) states this filter matches up correctly, why would kubota's filter be better? i have run only kubota filters/oils on the equipment up to current. 856 hours on b7800, and 589 on rtv 900 with no problems. common sence might suggest to stick with the kubota filters, but money is a little tight right now and maybe i was just throwing money away paying for higher priced kubota filters (i will stick with the sudt2 oil). i am a by the book minded person when it comes to pm on equipment. my equipment is highly maintained and the manuels state to "use only a genuine kubota filter to prevent serious damage" and that "to ensure long life of your kubota product, use only kubota genuine parts." how true is that or is it a sales pitch? i know if i went with oem replacement parts on my vehicles, i would spent a fortune more. (door handle for truck: dealer=$79, auto zone=$39 and this is just one instance) and i have been running napa and fram filters on my vehicles with pennzoil. i didn't put all these miles on myself, but 04 gmc truck has 219,000 miles on it, 96 gmc truck has 228,000 miles on it, and 05 jeep liberty has 82,000 miles on it. yes both trucks have reman engines in them, but still.
the golf course i worked on run kubota engines in just about all turf equipment we used, and we used napa filters and i saw those engines worked hard up to and over 2500 hours. even used non kubota udt hydrolic oil, but the most equipment was jacobsen, not kubota, just kubota engines.
so for all the mechanics, experts, and people with experience, what do you all think? i will be keeping my equipment for as long as possible, and it is used in a business/commercial setting and gets the hours put on. last year b7800= 300+ hours, rtv 900= 200+ hours and the hours will atleast be just as high each year. the dealer is no further away then the local napa store, so price difference is the only deciding factor. but if someone out there knows if, how, and why kubota filters are better, then that will negate the price difference for me.
i greatly will appreciate any and all info. never too much information for me. thanks to everyone in advance!