I think the 3616 compares closer to the L3800. They are within 120 lbs in weight (Kubota heavier), within about 1 hp, nearly the same tire size. The Mahindra is a foot longer and a little wider. The Mahindra lifts 500 lbs more in the bucket, has a larger pump, lifts 650 lb more at the three-point. The Kubota has 1.2 HP more at 100 rpm more. This is a pretty close comparison, and I'd go with the one you like best. The Mahindra wins in the specs department, but you aren't driving a spreadsheet, and in most circumstances the Kubota specs would be more than adequate. That being said, as a Mahindra dealer I'd make a good case that our Mitsubishi built 16 series is the one to buy.
If you compare with a B series, then you might look at our Max 28XL. It has 1 PTO HP less than the B3030 (22 vs 23), and is real close in specs in most areas, with the B3030 being a little ahead in many specs (but it should be, it's a 30HP machine, vs the mid-compact 28 HP Max) The Mahindra loader is rated at 1402 lbs. vs the B3030 at 1091 lbs.
Ironically, the Max 28XL FEL outlifts the L3800 in the specs I am reviewing. That doesn't sound right, so Kubota fans please correct me. I am looking at the LA524 specs, maybe they are outdated?
I just put out a bunch of specs after saying that specs aren't that important. Just trying to confuse the matter I guess. :laughing: We do see buyers that just anguish over certain specs when it really matters more to buy a comfortable, high quality tractor from a dealer you trust. Most of these compact tractors will do way more than people think they will, and seldom do people max them out unless they try using them as forklifts or bulldozers.