HOME  DISCUSSIONS  PHOTOS  REVIEWS  CLASSIFIEDS  DEALERS  STORE
 

Go Back   TractorByNet.com > Mahindra > Mahindra Owning/Operating
Show Recent Threads:
24 Hours
Since My Last Visit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-18-2005, 07:21 PM   #11 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 12
Default Re: 4510 ROPS?

Rick is right I would seroiusly talk to a local dealer to better match up your units.
RED_TRACTOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2005, 07:47 PM   #12 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 5
Default Re: 4510 ROPS?

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( IT SEEMS AS THOUGH YOU ARE PUSHING THE TYM PRODUCT.
WHAT HAS BEEN YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH THEM?
JUST KINDA CURIOUS I DONT HEAR ALL THAT MUCH ABOUT THEM. )</font>

We just took delivery of one. There seems much to like with them except the hydraulic system. Lots of leaks and hoses uncliping. If they had only spent a few extra hours and about $100 at the factory we'd be out there touting how great they were instead we're busy fetching oil and clamps.
LVFross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2005, 03:16 PM   #13 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 390
Default Re: 4510 ROPS?

Hey there Wallace

You are probably about pulling too large a cutter behind Mah 4110. In my case I tried the Woods to see what would happen. 8 ft Brush Bull specs call for 40 hp or better tractor. The Bull weighs 1289 lbs. The 6 ft one weighs in at 1039 only 150 lbs less weight than 8 ft. Of course a smaller hp tractor needed for 6 foot; 30 hp. I think water in front tires and some other weight on front would make the 4110 handle fine. When the cutter starts out it takes a while to wind up. Once it's moving, it's a cuttin son of a gun. The Mahindra rated at 41 hp. and the B Bull needs 40 hp. tractor seems like a border line match to me. Maybe not the best, but should be ok. My question, why would one have to worry about a broken pto shaft? Do you think that cutter would put that much of a strain on the tractor PTO?

By the way, if I were buying a brush hog, I would go for 6 ft and maybe consider 7 ft. I do realize it's pushing it for 8 ft. It's just I have the Woods and it's almost new.

Cheers......Coffeeman
coffeeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2005, 03:29 PM   #14 (permalink)
Veteran Member
 
shvl73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NH
Posts: 2,340
Default Re: 4510 ROPS?

I thought the hp requirements were stated in pto hp, not gross hp.
shvl73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2005, 05:45 PM   #15 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 390
Default Re: 4510 ROPS?

I always thought that too. Unless I don't understand term used in Woods operator's manual, specifications say:

Recommended Maximum Tractor HP 40-120.

Although it states maximum HP I am gussing the 40 is mimimum. Just for info 72" is 35-120 and 60" is 30-120. Manual also states 20% of gross weight of equipment and tractor should rest on front wheels. I think tractor weighs about 5000 lbs and cutter at 1200. So I guess I need at least 1200 lbs on front wheels. If I had a loader I'd be in business. I have searched manual for a reference to PTO HP and can't find one. Only other thing is maybe I should assume that tractor HP means PTO HP. In that case I'm really out of luck. However, Mahindra seems like it would handle cutter well with more weight.

Cheers......Coffeeman
coffeeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 PM.


HOME DISCUSSIONS PHOTOS REVIEWS CLASSIFIEDS DEALERS STORE
About TractorByNet.com | Terms of Service | Advertise | © 2008 TractorByNet.com