|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 24
|
Hey everyone,
Im new to the forum and had a few question about a Montana 3940 vs. the farmtrac 390. I already owned a farmtrac 360 a few years ago and loved it, powerful and could work all-day great machine. Since looking at the two and reading, it seems that they are the same tractor, but farmtrac痴 390 seems to have a better lifting rate and weight痴 more. Why is this if they are the same tractor? I do like the Montana 3840 weights and more pto power, but where I live is kind of hilly and I've been reading a lot that hydro is better for hills. Also how many have owned a farmtarc 390 or Montana 3940 I would like to know the feed back on them since I知 a little worried about going to Hydrostatic. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Silver Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ottawa Ont Canada
Posts: 101
|
I purchased a new 3940HST in Dec 2007 an I already have 65 hours on it (all snow removal
). I am very impressed with the machine and I recommend the HST; I upgraded from my old Ford 2000 gear to the HST and the HST is way more productive and very simple to operate. I think the only time you might want to not have HST is if you do a lot of long heavy pulls like plowing. Here is a list of my likes and dislikes (opinion): Like: Loader is strong mitsubishi diesel is a beautiful engine - strong, smooth and quiet tractor includes options (like rear hydraulics) HST is very nice especially where aux equipment load down (snowblowing) Dislike: loader did not include a grill guard (before I could make one I managed to smash the plastic grill and had to replace it - at less than 5 hours on the machine )Rear mounted fuel tank reduces visibility of hitch 3pnt lift arm does not have an easy height adjustment; my old tractor can be adjusted from the seat (hand crank)- the 3940 you have to get off and adjust the nut manually. This makes hooking up implements much more difficult. PTO switch can be accidently bumped 'ON' with your knee - very dangerous Side by side forward/reverse pedals are nicer than having to lift your leg to use a front to back rocker type (like Kubota). Brake pedals are on the LEFT - you can use them! Kubota HST has them on the right with the HST pedal which is usless. Glow plug light is not visible in daylight - I will modify mine to a LED No service manual available - I am going to post a new thread here next and see if anyone knows of one. Overall I would highly recommend this tractor; the main concern I have long term is the lack of service info available. I believe that the new R series is even nicer P.S. I am not knocking Kubota - family member bought a 3400HST at the same time I bought my 3940 - the 3400HST is a very nice machine also. Cheers, Mike Last edited by mwb; 03-19-2008 at 03:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Moyie Springs, Idaho and Kalispell, Montana
Posts: 996
|
Hi HK. What swayed you towards a Case? Just curious as we don't have any Case dealers out this way and I don't get to see thier compacts very often. Does't Shibaura make Case? We sell ASV and the 50 and 60 hp machines are Perkins engines manufactured by Shibaura so I think Shibaura is good stuff. Just wondering why you went Case.
Maka |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| About TractorByNet.com | Terms of Service | Advertise | © 2008 TractorByNet.com |