Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
03-12-2013, 01:31 PM #1Silver Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 246
WORKMASTER 55 vs TT-50A
I have been looking at some of these in 2-WD versions, both used and new.
No loader or anything, just a basic tractor.
Which one would be the best performance and reliability wise?
Engine looks the same 4-cyl except Workmaster 55 is turbocharged and TIER III.
TT-50A is non-turbo and TIER II.
I don't really care too much whether it's synchro-shuttle or not, I just want the machine that will run the best, start easy and have long-term reliability. Workmaster has 5 more HP, but that isn't significant for how I will be using it.
Even fuel economy is not that important if one is otherwise better than the other.
If I can find them in similiar condition, maybe slightly lower price for TT, which one should I go for?
Does the TIER III vs TIER II make much difference (EGR ,etc.) or did they just add the turbo to take care of that?
-
03-20-2013, 09:49 AM #2Gold Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Posts
- 475
- Tractor
- all new holland
Re: WORKMASTER 55 vs TT-50A
nothing really changes between tier 2 or tier 3. Tier 4 is where the big changes are. The workmaster series hasnt reached tier 4 yet. I personally woudl go with the newer Workmaster. The TT50A is a nice tractor but the engine in the workmaster is newer and better. IMO. Also, some tier 2 models, if you did have engine problems, you may not be able to find a replacement motor. We have experienced that issue on skid steers and one tractor....just my opinion
-
03-25-2013, 01:20 PM #3Silver Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 246
Re: WORKMASTER 55 vs TT-50A
jdbnh, Thank you for the information. If there is little difference between the Tier 2 or Tier 3 performance then I will be considering the Workmaster or Farmall A equivalent.
-
03-25-2013, 06:56 PM #4Veteran Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 1,369
- Location
- South Carolina
- Tractor
- 2008 John Deere 5203 MFWD(56hp/47pto hp turbo) & John Deere 910A 22hp Kawasaki/54" deck
Re: WORKMASTER 55 vs TT-50A
Those Workmasters and Farmall A tractors are VERY nice! I would have looked more in depth at them when I bought my 5203 (56hp) 5 years ago, but the local NH or Case dealer wasn't established as well as they are now. I think the transmission is a synch shuttle on the Workmaster and wasn't on the TT series, but don't quote me on that.
John Deere 5203 MFWD
John Deere 910A 54" 7-Iron PRO deck
-
04-22-2013, 06:27 PM #5Silver Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 197
- Location
- Maryland
- Tractor
- Ford 1710, Ford 5600, NH Workmaster 55
Re: WORKMASTER 55 vs TT-50A
Love our WM 55. Stone reliable for the 18 months we've had it. The TPH set up is very versatile. FEL is good and I love the quickattach set up. We have the backhoe for it too and that's a very nice unit as well.
Similar Threads
-
75 50A rear main seal leak
By Jervis in forum Massey Ferguson Owning/OperatingReplies: 4Last Post: 11-28-2012, 08:47 PM -
Backhoe 1974 Massey Ferguson 50A backhoe service manual
By Jervis in forum Massey Ferguson Owning/OperatingReplies: 3Last Post: 08-29-2012, 10:27 PM -
MF 50A with AD4-203 diesel will not start after injector pump rebuild
By CLIFFF in forum Massey Ferguson Owning/OperatingReplies: 2Last Post: 06-27-2012, 10:26 AM -
Backhoe MF 50A Backhoe Barrel Cylinder
By kpmcneil in forum Massey Ferguson Owning/OperatingReplies: 1Last Post: 05-25-2011, 08:49 PM -
TT-50A first good work out
By bondo in forum New Holland Owning/OperatingReplies: 0Last Post: 09-24-2007, 10:57 AM


Reply With Quote
