BruceNorthEast
Bronze Member
I've heard that the only real difference between the TC35, TC40 and TC45 is the engine itself.
I was told by one dealer that some of the values are derated on the '35 but it has the same frame, transmission, hydraulics, etc.
He said something about it being derated due to the peak HP on the '35 not happening where they need to state it... All I can guess that he meant here was that when the engine is revving for the PTO to be at the standard 540 RPMs, the engine is not at peak HP and would reach it if the throttle was moved (up?). Doesn't that implie that the '35 cant supply enough power to run the pumps & PTO while moving?
The 16LA FEL that they put onto the TC35 is exactly the same as the one they put onto the TC40/45 isn't it? Yet the specs are a little worse on the '35. If the frame is the same (which comparing the dimensions on the specs indicates that it may well be) then why would the FEL be rated for lower values? (even the breakout force is rated about 300 lbs lower for the '35 vs the '40/45 - even at the bucket pivot pins! shouldn't this be independent of the tractor? engine?) /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif
If the hydraulics are the same, why would the 3PH be listed as 305 lbs weaker? Is it the HP issue alluded to earlier? If so, the '35 doesn't have enough power at the 540 PTO RPM setting to power the hydraulics? Or is this marketing?? /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif
Not to understate the difference between the engines, as the four cylinder units in the '40/45 are significantly more powerful & no doubt better overall.
But are the engines really the only difference and if so why the variation in specs?
Bruce.
I was told by one dealer that some of the values are derated on the '35 but it has the same frame, transmission, hydraulics, etc.
He said something about it being derated due to the peak HP on the '35 not happening where they need to state it... All I can guess that he meant here was that when the engine is revving for the PTO to be at the standard 540 RPMs, the engine is not at peak HP and would reach it if the throttle was moved (up?). Doesn't that implie that the '35 cant supply enough power to run the pumps & PTO while moving?
The 16LA FEL that they put onto the TC35 is exactly the same as the one they put onto the TC40/45 isn't it? Yet the specs are a little worse on the '35. If the frame is the same (which comparing the dimensions on the specs indicates that it may well be) then why would the FEL be rated for lower values? (even the breakout force is rated about 300 lbs lower for the '35 vs the '40/45 - even at the bucket pivot pins! shouldn't this be independent of the tractor? engine?) /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif
If the hydraulics are the same, why would the 3PH be listed as 305 lbs weaker? Is it the HP issue alluded to earlier? If so, the '35 doesn't have enough power at the 540 PTO RPM setting to power the hydraulics? Or is this marketing?? /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif
Not to understate the difference between the engines, as the four cylinder units in the '40/45 are significantly more powerful & no doubt better overall.
But are the engines really the only difference and if so why the variation in specs?
Bruce.