Why NH TC40D
I was a phone call away from buying a JD 4400 (vs a TC33D) when I took another look at the TC40D. There are several reasons why I went with the TC40D:
- class III frame size (heavier/longer)
- 4 cylinder
- 16LA loader was made for these tractors...not an after-thought
- down-sloping hood gives great visibility when using loader and other front implements; when off, you can see everything (e.g. for mowing)
- two HST pedals on right, split steering brake on left (does NOT use the treadle pedal like the class II's)
- 5 more HP than the TC35 but the TC45 doesn't have center PTO
- great ergonomics (joystick w/HST switch, seat, tilt/telescope steering wheel,etc.)
- the "D" model has standard many things that you have to pay for separately on the JD's (e.g. deluxe 3pt hitch, folding ROPS, etc.)
- overall, the TC40D/16LA loader seems like a "modern" design while the JDs and Kubotas seem like they were designed 20 years ago and never really changed.
The TC40D is NOT the cheapest tractor out there, and the local dealer was not willing to negotiate prices, and I probably paid too much for it. But the difference in $5K or so over 20 years is easier to swallow when I knew I got what I really wanted.
Well, actually, what I REALLY wanted was a true off-road tractor, for example: Antonio Carraro TTR 4400 HST (
http://www.holdertractor.com/c870h/main-c870h.html), or even a Wisconsin Engineering W-5000 (<A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.wisconsineng.com/Tractors/English/W5000/w-5000.htm>http://www.wisconsineng.com/Tractors/English/W5000/w-5000.htm</A>), but there are no dealers anywhere near New England. And in the case of the first two, the cost was in another league than compact tractors from JD/NH/Kubota.
But as far as traditional "agricultural-type" designed tractors (large rear wheels, small front) goes, the TC40D topped my list.