|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Schenectady, NY
Posts: 387
|
I wish my blades still looked like those!!
__________________
98 JD 1070 (573 hrs), 440 JD Loader, 8B JD Back Hoe, 5' King Kutter Rotary Cutter, 6' King Kutter Landscape Rake, 7' King Kutter Back Blade, 6' Farm Force Box Blade, Custom Design/Built Grapple, Farm Force PHD w/ 9" & 12" Augers |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Super Star Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Central florida
Posts: 19,243
|
JD equipment is reasonably built.. I think that is a given.
Lack of a stump jumper on a light duty or finish mower seems perfectly acceptable as it reduces weight and cost. Those seem like 'good' reasons to me... If you are mowing light clean fields.. you don't need a mower built like an abrahms tank with a matching price tage.. when something lighter and cheaper will do... and still be a quality name brand machine.. etc. Soundguy Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Northern California-Tehama Co.
Posts: 1,861
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| About TractorByNet.com | Terms of Service | Advertise | © 2008 TractorByNet.com |