well I'm not a structural rubber engineer, but.....
I would have thought a 7 foot finishing mower would have more than one drive belt, versus
just one super long one, 5/8 inch wide. Slightly more than half an inch. And the oem was junky plain rubber; for sure I replaced it with
kevlar but still, I'm driving three half inch thick heavy blades with 50 pto hp and I would think a belt should be bigger than 5/8.
The construction of the mower is tank-like; I'm only quibbling with the belt.
And I went out and mowed the roadsides with those razor sharp blades this afternon and boy it looked nice. The joys of having no rocks to hit.
And since I sharpened them yes you could have used them as seriously macho steak knives if you were strong enough...
Without rocks and lawn IED's, I go for maximum sharpness, not durability. I've had the mower two years and I have one 1/8 inch ding in one of the three blades.
I did find however when I was sharpening the blades that the large internal scalp roller under the rear of the deck, can't see it from outside, was frozen in place, would not turn, which
explained some strange scrapes I left in a few spots. Stuck a crowbar under there, bent it back enough to free up the roller, and the show goes on.
Now those two roller brackets were not beefy enough, they should not have bent. A demerit to LP.
I think they intentionally limit the horsepower to the blades/gearbox by providing only so much friction with that single wimpy belt.
That's one way of making sure you don't have gearbox warranty claims, right?
And I did break the oem one when pushing hard through heavy tall grass, Kubota's electronic speed mgmt worked fine, engine never slowed and this mower is rated
to take more than my model's hp by memory. So the belt is the weakest link. And I'm thinking it is by design.
I sold my LP bushhog, didn't think I'd need it any more. big mistake