Yes and no. Yes, you can feel the impacts from the sand like bee stings. No, that does not mean it works better. The coal slag crumbles when it hits the object. That helps keep blast damage to the object down. Ever sand blast body panels? They stretch and warp like a son of a gun. They don't do that (near as much) with the slag. The sharp edges of the slag do cut paint very well. IMHO better than sand. That's just opinion based on about 50 bags of the black stuff and 5x that with sand. Not a lot in some quarters, so I don't claim it to be gospel! It does NOT do near as well on rusty cast as sand. Nothing is perfect. I'd rather give up some with the black stuff than get the silicosis. But that's just me.
jb
Let me repeat my statement:
"My point is that #2 silica was by far the better product for removal, vs. coal slag. Only expensive products like oxides, or carbide, work better".
I did not say it was better for damage or warpage. If your interested in removal, the sharper and stronger it is, the better it works, because it is more abrasive. Try blasting a heavily scaled utility trailer with coal slag, I have, I'll pass.
I like to get the job done. I don't enjoy sandblasting, I want it to work fast.
As far as the silicosis goes, you wear a respirator, and if your not wearing one no matter what your using, that's stupid.
I work with dangerous and toxic chemicals all day long, I don't worry about just one risk, and I can't completely eliminate them.
And yes, I have blasted body panels, for 30 years, and you have a long way to go to do it as much as I have.
It's all a moot point, since you can't get #2 silica anymore.