10-06-2009, 07:51 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2007 Location: eastern PA-lower Poconos
Posts: 506
| Re: R1 versus R4
__________________ Eastern PA -JD2320 w/R4; 200CX w/61" bucket & Markham toothbar or JD adj forks; 46BH w/16", Imatch, ballastbox & York rake-blade-scarifer, 54" front plow and trailer receiver |
| |
10-06-2009, 07:54 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Elite Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Daleville, IN
Posts: 3,441
| Re: R1 versus R4 I vote for R1's but I could have sworn I have heard others on this thread say R4's were the cats meow on snow but now give the nod to R1's...
Chris |
| |
10-06-2009, 09:24 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Super Star Member
Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: South Bend, Indiana (near)
Posts: 14,422
| Re: R1 versus R4 My R4s were downright the wrong tire for my needs on our older 2WD tractor loader. They are good for industrial sites where tire puncture is a concern, but stink in sand, mud, snow or on lawns.
__________________ MossRoad 
Click On My Little Tractor
To See Pictures And Videos
Of It In Action!!! |
| |
10-06-2009, 09:25 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Gold Member
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Kokomo, IN
Posts: 274
| Re: R1 versus R4 What designates the rice patty ags over the more standard US tread depth, is it a different R number or what? I have a pair I am trying to replace that I use on a cub cadet garden tractor, 6-12 in size, Bridgestone Farm Lug M and made in Japan is all I can decipher on the sides of them, they are the cats arse for plow days, just running 1 pair of IH wheel weights, I have no problem pulling a 10" brinly plow in 2nd gear with 7hp under the hood. But dry rot and a side wall tear that is booted but expanding now is going to retire them pretty quick. Any source for a new or good used pair? Mike 
__________________ IH Cub Cadet, building it better since 1961
IH Cub Cadet 70
IH Cub Cadet 105 |
| |
10-06-2009, 09:41 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Silver Member
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Gallatin TN
Posts: 211
| Re: R1 versus R4 |
| |
10-06-2009, 10:22 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Elite Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: End of a long driveway
Posts: 4,286
| Re: R1 versus R4 Quote:
Originally Posted by MossRoad My R4s were downright the wrong tire for my needs on our older 2WD tractor loader. They are good for industrial sites where tire puncture is a concern, but stink in sand, mud, snow or on lawns. | R-4's are fine on lawns, sand, mud & snow. If they "stunk", nobody would get anything done with 80% of the tractors on TBN, which are R4's. Nobody would get anything done with a backhoe, all of which are equipped with R4's.
You just have to know how to operate a tractor MossRoad;1774393.  Maybe you should ask for some tractor driving lessons for Christmas??? 
__________________ '00 New Holland LB115 4x4 Backhoe: 108HP, Powershift. Cab-AC, 4WD/4WS, posi front/rear axles, 4in1 FEL, X-hoe, Aux hammer hydraulics, Gannon compactor & buckets. '05 AGCO/Challenger MT285B 4x4 CUT: 48HP HST, Cab-AC, 4in1 q/a FEL w/ aux hyd, 90" Landpride Power Rake, 8' Meyer P/A snowplow, Herd spreader. '07 GMC 3500 SRW 4x4 Crewcab SLT: Dmax/Ally, utility body '92 IH 4800 4x4 Dumptruck: DTA-466 at 250HP, airbrakes, 7 sp w/OD, Fabco front axle & transfer case, airbrakes, 12' dump, 33K/56K GCWR. |
| |
10-06-2009, 10:54 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Bronze Member
Join Date: May 2006 Location: NW Mississippi
Posts: 76
| Re: R1 versus R4 I wanted R1s but when buying used you sometimes take what you can find and found exactly what I was looking for except the tractor had R4s. I bought my tractor in April and so far have been pleased with the R4s. I would still prefer R1s but the R4s are better than I expected. |
| |
10-06-2009, 10:58 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Elite Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: End of a long driveway
Posts: 4,286
| Re: R1 versus R4 Quote:
Originally Posted by buck12 I wanted R1s but when buying used you sometimes take what you can find and found exactly what I was looking for except the tractor had R4s. I bought my tractor in April and so far have been pleased with the R4s. I would still prefer R1s but the R4s are better than I expected. | Part of that could be because they're new. New R-4's are pretty decent when the edges on the tire bars are new and sharp. Once they round off, the traction quality goes down a bit, too.
__________________ '00 New Holland LB115 4x4 Backhoe: 108HP, Powershift. Cab-AC, 4WD/4WS, posi front/rear axles, 4in1 FEL, X-hoe, Aux hammer hydraulics, Gannon compactor & buckets. '05 AGCO/Challenger MT285B 4x4 CUT: 48HP HST, Cab-AC, 4in1 q/a FEL w/ aux hyd, 90" Landpride Power Rake, 8' Meyer P/A snowplow, Herd spreader. '07 GMC 3500 SRW 4x4 Crewcab SLT: Dmax/Ally, utility body '92 IH 4800 4x4 Dumptruck: DTA-466 at 250HP, airbrakes, 7 sp w/OD, Fabco front axle & transfer case, airbrakes, 12' dump, 33K/56K GCWR. |
| |
10-07-2009, 12:28 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Bronze Member
Join Date: May 2006 Location: NW Mississippi
Posts: 76
| Re: R1 versus R4 Quote:
Originally Posted by Builder Part of that could be because they're new. New R-4's are pretty decent when the edges on the tire bars are new and sharp. Once they round off, the traction quality goes down a bit, too. | Just had to bust my bubble didn't you. Just kidding your comments seem logical. |
| |
10-07-2009, 07:18 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2006 Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 589
| Re: R1 versus R4 My Kubota with R4's slips sideways a=on slopes that are damp and clogs up with wet soil easily... it's lawn friendly.
NH with R1's does not slip - slide - or hardly even spin when plowing or pulling. Leaves small mars in the lawn.
If you are doing things with you lawn - don't get R1's - other wise - don't get R4's. |
| | | |