Arky217
Silver Member
I read in a couple of old posts that if you have wheel weights AND loaded tires, it could put too much strain on your drive axles, etc.
My L4200 Kubota doesn't have filled tires but it has 3 sets of wheel weights (total of 360 #).
The tires are R4's, size 17.5 x 24.
I just don't have enough traction with just the wheel weights. The tractor has a loader and when I get in a hard pull, the rears just slip and the fronts really dig in. I'm afraid it's putting too much strain on the fwd.
I am considering putting wwf in the rears.
It would take 55 gal. in each tire to bring it to the valve stems.
But I was wondering, since it has the wheel weights, maybe I should put about 25 gal. in each tire instead.
Do you think that would be prudent, or do you think that I should not have any problems filling them all the way to the stems ?
( Of course, I could use ballast on the 3ph, for just pulling from the drawbar, but when I wanted to use something like a box blade, I would have to remove the ballast and the weight on the tires would be lighter again).
My L4200 Kubota doesn't have filled tires but it has 3 sets of wheel weights (total of 360 #).
The tires are R4's, size 17.5 x 24.
I just don't have enough traction with just the wheel weights. The tractor has a loader and when I get in a hard pull, the rears just slip and the fronts really dig in. I'm afraid it's putting too much strain on the fwd.
I am considering putting wwf in the rears.
It would take 55 gal. in each tire to bring it to the valve stems.
But I was wondering, since it has the wheel weights, maybe I should put about 25 gal. in each tire instead.
Do you think that would be prudent, or do you think that I should not have any problems filling them all the way to the stems ?
( Of course, I could use ballast on the 3ph, for just pulling from the drawbar, but when I wanted to use something like a box blade, I would have to remove the ballast and the weight on the tires would be lighter again).