Short Game
Veteran Member
I miss my little 27 HP Cub Cadet's bigger, more powerful, loader. My new 2010, 41 HP, LS's loader wouldn't come close to doing that job.That's bold!! I like it
PS: I'm waiting for someone from LS to read these posts and send me a message about how they are going to make it better. (Hint, hint.) They can't get national advertising like this. To start with, they put bigger cylinders on their 2011s. So they obviously have a clue that something is wrong with this picture. Anyway, every time this loader disappoints me, I'll mention it. It's not that I like being the squeaky wheel, but I have to expect more from a third more weight and horsepower with a bigger pump and higher hydraulic pressure on a brand new tractor (200 hours in the three months since delivery). If they want to sell more tractors, they'll want everyone to know that their R40** series tractor's loaders are right up there with a 1996 27 HP Cub Cadet's. As well, when I'm happy with this loader, I'll be sure to tell everyone here that too.
Last edited: